Answer:
Option (D) is correct.
Explanation:
We have to use MM proposition that cost of equity will change itself in such a manner so that it can take care of its debt.
Cost of equity:
= WACC of all equity firm + (WACC of all equity - Cost of debt ) × (Debt -to-equity ratio)
At the beginning, when there was no debt,
WACC = cost of equity = 10%
Levered cost of equity:
= 10% + ( 10% - 6%) × 0.2
= 10.8%
Therefore, Taggart's levered cost of equity would be closest to 11%.
Answer:
a. Firm M probably has a higher dividend payout ratio than Firm N.
Explanation:
The dividend payout ratio is commonly referred to a portion of the net income of the company which is paid to the various shareholders in dividends. Therefore, if we consider the statements made in the question, Firm M has a higher annual net income while the annual net income of Firm N is fluctuating, we can conclude that the dividend payout ratio of Firm M is more than that of Firm N.
Answer:
C) person who works well alone
Explanation:
