1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Viefleur [7K]
3 years ago
8

During the Glorious Revolution, why did Parliament remove James II and invite William III and Mary II to rule England? A to prev

ent a popular uprising B to ensure religious tolerance in England C to ensure a Protestant monarchy
D to reform the Church of England
History
2 answers:
Mnenie [13.5K]3 years ago
7 0

The correct answer is C) to ensure a Protestant monarchy.

During the Glorious Revolution, the Parliament removed James II and invited William III and Mary II to rule England to ensure a Protestant monarchy.

English Catholic King James II was not popular among the court and the British Parliament. So he was overthrown during the so-called Glorious Revolution that started in 1688 and ended in 1689. He was succeeded by his daughter Mary and her husband, William the Orange, both Protestants. The removal of King James II not only had religious issues but political ones. The change helped the British Parliament to gain more power over the monarchy.

gtnhenbr [62]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

C to ensure a Protestant monarchy

Explanation:

A few months after the coronation, Jacob, who openly professed the Catholic faith, began to pursue a policy that provoked the extreme displeasure of the Protestant majority. Under the pretext of fighting small rebellions, the king created a standing army, the size of which quickly grew to 40 thousand soldiers, and armed it with powerful artillery; at the same time, the Catholics from Ireland were preferred when recruiting soldiers. In November of the same 1685, the parliament was dissolved. In 1687, the king issued a Declaration on Religious Tolerance, favorable to Catholics. Fears of the Catholic restoration in the country and a new redistribution of property pushed away from the king his natural supporters - the Tories. The king appointed Catholics to all key posts in the country, and all who showed the slightest discontent or disobedience were immediately removed from their posts. The policy of "religious tolerance" in relation to the Catholics provoked a sharp protest from the Anglican bishops, as well as from the public indignant at the beginning expulsion of Protestants from neighboring France after the abolition of the Edict of Nantes (1685).

Opponents of the king (both Tories and Whigs) rallied in secret opposition, the moderate wing of which was led by the Marquis of Halifax, and the more radical one - by Count Danby (Thomas Osborne). Most importantly, part of the army officers, including army commander John Churchill, also participated in the conspiracy. Together, they decided to discuss the option of changing the "tyrant-papist" to the Dutch couple - Maria and Wilhelm.

Prince William of Orange was the largest figure among Protestant rulers throughout Europe, and as the ruler of the Netherlands he was worried about Jacob II's strengthening of the English army and navy, especially in light of the prospect of a possible Anglo-French alliance. Therefore, the removal of Jacob II from power seemed to William extremely desirable even regardless of his own prospects to become the ruler of England. By this time, Wilhelm had visited England several times and gained great popularity there.

You might be interested in
Which statement accurately describes Rome at the end of the Punic Wars? A. Veterans of the war were richly rewarded by the gover
Sauron [17]
"<span>C. The Roman Republic was strengthened by the newly-empowered plebeians" would be the best description from the list, but this was not a universal truth. </span>
3 0
4 years ago
How did the loss of so many male soldiers affect the women and children after the civil war in the south?
Jobisdone [24]
Nearly as many men died in captivity during the Civil War as were killed in the whole of the ... Military Deaths in American Wars ... The Civil War Trust does not agree with this claim.
4 0
4 years ago
The Founders did not fully trust the people to elect the president, so they pu that decision in the hands of a group called the
gogolik [260]

Answer:

Electoral college

Explanation:

At that time, the education rate among American citizens were pretty low. This was the reason why the founding fathers did not fully trust the people to elect the president. They're afraid that the people wouldn't be able to make an educated decision to choose the person who has the right criteria to lead the country. This was why they established the electoral college.

The electoral college consisted of representatives and senates that the citizens vote to work in the government. These representatives and senates tend to work for the interest of their own perspective states. They're the one who cast a vote to elect the president instead of the citizens.

3 0
3 years ago
The United States government works with the UN as part of its participation in the Convention against Transnational Organized Cr
matrenka [14]
United kingdom, United States, Canada, France, Norway, and Germany.
4 0
3 years ago
Japanese soldiers killed hundreds of thousands of Chinese civilians in the Manchurian Massacre. Japanese Massacre. Chinese Massa
pantera1 [17]

The so-called Manchurian Massacre took place in 1931 when the Japanese army sought and pronounced an excuse to attack Manchuria, so the Chinese army, knowing that, did not respond to the attack, and this event is known as the Invasion of Manchuria. What was really a massacre was the Nanking Massacre, when Japanese soldiers from Shanghai launched into Nanking and easily defeated the Chinese army, and then massacred some 300,000 people, committed robbery. The official position of the People's Republic of China was first that this number of 300,000 included both killed soldiers and victims of the massacre, but later this claim was changed, that it was about 300,000 people massacred exclusively killed soldiers.

The answer is: Nanking Massacre.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did monarchs feel the need to practice absolutism?
    7·2 answers
  • Who among the following believed in an intermediate society and the value of traditions?
    11·2 answers
  • Which four states were the last to rejoin the united states
    12·1 answer
  • How did the resolution of the Korean War impact global politics, especially in the Pacific?
    6·1 answer
  • 2) In the late 1800s a new "elite" group of Europeans controlled 30-40% of 1 point
    8·1 answer
  • What percentage of a state’s slaves be counted as part of population
    5·2 answers
  • Which of these best describe Oliver Cromwell
    10·2 answers
  • What was a motivation for imperial nations to expand their territory?
    7·2 answers
  • Why was the discovery of large amounts of coal a cause of the Industrial Revolution?
    13·1 answer
  • What did Ronald Reagan greatly increase while in office
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!