Answer:
A revisionist view of Bartolome de las Casas as the ‘author’ of the introduction of African slaves to the Indies/Americas in the early 16th century. The article details Las Casas’ thinking and actions and concludes that while Las Casas did—among other contemporaries—suggest the importation of African slaves to lift the burden of oppression off the Amerindians, his perspective and view was altered radically in the last third of his life. The article explores the meaning of African slavery in the context of the place and time where Las Casas grew up—Andalucía in southern Spain—where slavery was quite different from the way it developed on the plantations of the Americas. And the article relates how Las Casas’ theoretical and practical defense of Amerindians eventually was extended by Las Casas’ into a defense of liberty for all men, including African slaves.
Explanation:
Ideas of John Locke and de Montesquieu were influential because they appealed to:- the idea of popular sovereignty, - the idea that government should serve the people,- the ideas about equality, natural right and social contract between people and its government.
All three of the Government, companies, and public have steps to do to stop recession. I'll give you one for each.
-The Government can Encourage exportations. No country can satisfy its need by its own. So encouraging exportation will help to not cause inflation in the country, turning the country from consumer to producer.
-The companies can try to innovate their products based on the customers wants. This will help the company to stay in the race against the others. The key is keeping customers satisfied.
-The public can work more. You should always try to work a little more than average, increasing your work hours per week. This will not harm anyone, but help your country.
Hope this Helps! :)
Answer:Universal suffrage (also called universal franchise, general suffrage, and common suffrage of the common man) gives the right to vote to all adult citizens, regardless of wealth, income, gender, social status, race, ethnicity, political stance, or any other restriction, subject only to relatively minor exceptions.[1][2] In its original 19th-century usage by reformers in Britain, universal suffrage was understood to mean only universal manhood suffrage; the vote was extended to women later, during the women's suffrage movement.[3][4]
There are variations among countries in terms of specifics of the right to vote; the minimum age is usually between 18 and 25 years (see age of majority) and "the insane, certain classes of convicted criminals, and those punished for certain electoral offenses" sometimes lack the right to vote.[2]
In the first modern democracies, governments restricted the vote to those with property and wealth, which almost always meant a minority of the male population.[5] In some jurisdictions, other restrictions existed, such as requiring voters to practice a given religion.[6] In all modern democracies, the number of people who could vote has increased progressively with time.[7][8] The 19th century saw many movements advocating "universal [male] suffrage", most notably in Europe, Great Britain and North America.[9][7]
Explanation:
People who hold religious ideas that oppose accepted church teachings . Heretics
