Answer:
The main point here on the appeal would be the fact that the Sherrods decided to stay silent on the last offer made by the Kidds to settle the situation, and rather decided to go ahead and look for a mandatory arbitration. When the Sherrods did that, the Kidds might have understood that they were not accepting their offer for 34.000 dollars and preffered to settle for the result of the mandatory arbitration, which established the price at 25.000 dollars.
Another point is that there was a big time lapse between the last offer made by the Kidds to settle with the Sherrods and their communicating that they would go for that final settlement offer, especially after the mandatory arbitration had already established a new price. This time lapse should also be taken in favor of the Kidds in their appeal
Finally, the matter should have ended when the final decision for the arbitration was given
So it should be expected that on appeal the decision reached in the mandatory arbritration be upheld, instead of the new sum which was initially assumed not accepted by the Sherrods when they went through with the arbitration.
Answer: b) clashing belief systems between cultures.
Options:
a) the universality of cultural belief systems.
b) clashing belief systems between cultures.
c) the dominance of certain cultural belief systems,.
d) the diversity of cultural belief systems.
Explanation: Postformal thinking occurs after adolescence. It is at this stage that an individual becomes aware of the contradictions between the same ideas such as the clashing belief systems between cultures. In addition, during this stage of cognitive development , a person is better able to see how comp.ex some issues are, that everything is not black or white but there are varying shades of what is right and what is wrong.
Answer: Social roles began to change.
Explanation:
With improvement in farming communities hunters weren’t as mandatory and farmers that grew successful crops began to move up in social status. Meaning less need for hunters more need for farmers etc..
Answer:
i. the buyer receives a negotiable document of title for the goods
ii. The bailee acknowledges the buyer's right to possess the goods
iii. The buyer receives a nonnegotiable document of title, and the buyer has had a reasonable time to present the document to the bailee and demand the goods. If the bailee refuses to honor the document, the risk of loss remains with the seller
Explanation:
Sellers bear hazards when they are holding products for a purchaser, up until the purchaser claims the products. The vender likewise carries the danger of misfortune on exchanges that are deal on endorsement, in which a purchaser should authoritatively acknowledge the conveyed products before the deal is conclusive.
With any business exchange, there is a danger of misfortune. It's conceivable that either the purchaser or vendor in a transaction could bear the risk of disaster.
