Area with a set if common features and characteristics
Answer:
Group learning
Explanation:
When you study with others, not only will you learn the concept, but anyone else that is studying with you will learn too.
This is a good idea, as it will improve test score.
~theLocoCoco
This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:
You have walked in late to class, and your psychology professor is explaining how one personality theorist sees personality as a relatively stable set of potential responses to various situations. You know immediately that your professor is talking about the theories of
a. J.ulian Rotter.
b. B. F. Skinner
c. Albert Bandura
d. John Watson.
Answer:
You know immediately that your professor is talking about the theories of
a. J.ulian Rotter.
Explanation:
J.ulian B. Rotter was born in Brooklyn, New York, in 1916. He was a psychologist who developed influential theories such as social learning theory and locus of control. According to Rotter, personality can be described as a relatively stable set of potentials responses to different situations. However, stable does not mean unchangeable. To Rotter, if you can change the way a person thinks, you can also change the way they respond or behave.
NOTE: I had to spell J.ulian like this because, for some reason, Brainly interprets it as a bad word. That also happens with other similar names such as J.uliet.
Answer:
The correct term to answer your question is Relational Database.
Explanation:
A relational database is a database specifically structured to recognize relations between stored items information and can be joined through common fields and the data can be easily stored in tables.
Answer:
C.S. Lewis states that moral law is not a simply convention . He says "there are two reasons for saying it belongs to the same class as mathematics. The first is, as I said in the first chapter, that though there are differences between the moral ideas of one time or country and those of another, the differences are not really very great — not nearly so great as most people imagine — [...].The other reason is this. When you think about these differences between the morality of one people and another, do you think that the morality of one people is ever better or worse than that of another? Have any of the changes been improvements? If not, then of course there could never be any moral progress. Progress means not just changing, but changing for the better. If no set of moral ideas were truer or better than any other, there would be no sense in preferring civilized morality to savage morality, or Christian morality to Nazi morality."
Then the Law of Human Nature is compared as a standard or universal truth: "he moment you say that one set of moral ideas can be better than another, you are, in fact, measuring them both by a standard, saying that one of them conforms to that standard more nearly than the other. But the standard that measures two things is something different from either. You are, in fact, comparing them both with some Real Morality, admitting that there is such a thing as a real Right, independent of what people think, and that some people's ideas get nearer to that real Right than others."
Reference: Lewis, C.S. “Some Objections .” PBS, Public Broadcasting Service, 1952
