Answer:
around the 6th century or earlier
Explanation:
I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
Answer:
Thats because it straddles the continents of Europe and Asia, and because its historical experience is intertwined both with that of European states and with that of the Middle East.
Hope this helps!
The answer is Speed.
Speed is the norms of the millennial generation and is most likely the reason for the widespread influence of the "Google Effect". Speed leads to urge faster decision making and feedback on job performance. When we include Speed, we know that instant feedback is expected. The name itself (Speed) says it all.
In social experiments Location, age of patient or test subject, time of day, and gender of either party can play a big role in results and when changed alter the results making them dependent.
