Answer:
Debt to income ratio is all your debt payments divided by all the money you earn during a month. Generally you are considered to be in good financial shape when your debt to income ratio is less than 20%, if it's less than 10% it is even better.
Kim's gross income = $1,230 - $165 (taxes) = $1,065
Kim's total debt payments without new debt = $134 (credit card payments)
Kim's total debt payments including new debt = $134 + $172 (new debt) = $306
Kim's debt to income ration without new debt = $134 / $1,065 = 12.58%
Kim's debt to income ration with new debt = $306 / $1,065 = 28.73%
Currently Kim's debt to income ratio is only 12.58% which is very good, but if she takes the new loan then her ratio will increase to 28.73% which is extremely high and not prudent.
Answer:
Called the clients and cancelled jobs
Explanation:
If the plaintiff worked for the defendant and left to set up her own cleaning business, then she will most likely be bound by a non-compete clause.
So if she is saying she acted with the value of integrity, then she would called any of the defendant's clients and cancelled jobs in order to respect the non-compete clause.
However after sometime the non-compete clause is no longer binding.
$60 one year ago. The stock is now worth $70. During the year, the stock paid a dividend of $2.25. The total return to George from owning the stock would be 20% (after rounding off the answer to the nearest whole percent).
- Total return on share is the summation of dividend and price appreciation.
- Since, the dividend = $2.25
- Then, to ascertain price appreciation we need to subtract the dividend from the total return on the share.
- Price appreciation = $70 - $60 = $10
- Total return can be calculated hence.
- Total return = $10 + $2.25 = $12.25
- Therefore, the total return for George was $12.25.
- To round off the answer to the nearest whole percentage:
- Total return percent = $12.25/$60 = 20% approximately
Therefore, the total return to George from owning the stock would be 20%.
Learn more about total returns here:
brainly.com/question/13078425
#SPJ4
Customers are central to the principles of convergence. They should not be viewed as passive viewers of content but active users that play a central role in your narrative.
In order to create experiences that strengthen the customer's relationship with the brand, three powerful forces—media, technology, and creativity—come together through convergence. A customer-centric mindset must be adopted, and the entire organization must become responsive to the customer journey. Strategies must be supported by evidence from actual customer behavior rather than arbitrary gut instinct. It should be determined by that data where, when, and how to serve customers. Consumers must be involved in brand messaging through social platforms and ecosystems. The organization will always need to be modified for convergence. Testing, learning, constructing, and destroying are ongoing processes.
Learn more about convergence here:
brainly.com/question/15213854
#SPJ4
Answer:
$200,000 and $500,000
Explanation:
The computations are shown below:
For gain recognized:
= Fair market value of the received land - corporation basis
= $500,000 - $300,000
= $200,000
For land basis received by Red Blossom corporation:
= $500,000
It records only the fair market value of the land, not the land basis for tea Company so only $500,000 would be considered