Answer:
Others have argued against the use of the bombs, with evidence such as it was not needed, it was inhumane and it led to the modern atomic age and threat of nuclear war. Still, others argue that perhaps the first bomb used against Hiroshima was justified but that the second used against Nagasaki was not.
Explanation:
i love this question.
Unlikely, but it could happen
To to protect the family and pay the Bill and bring food to the table
Answer: America was neutral at the beginning of the war.
Explanation:
Woodward Wilson proposed the entry of America into the war on April 2, 1917. Four days later, Congress approved it. Until that moment, America was neutral. In America, there was a general lack of public interest in entering the war. Also, the United States had economic reasons for withdrawing from the war. Namely, in the first years of the war, Britain, and France quadrupled the import of weapons from the United States, which brought the country a huge financial gain. The public supported the government's decision on neutrality, during which time there were active slogans addressed to then-President Wilson that read "He who saved us from the war."
As the war progressed, the U.S. government worried that they might run out of money from selling weapons to France and Britain if they lost the war. One of the key factors involved in the war was the sinking of American ships by Germany. Also, Germany offered Mexico a secret war alliance and the return of territories that Mexico had lost to America. These were the key factors that changed the American attitude towards neutrality.
