Answer:
The correct answer is Option "b. The value of the currency would increase"
Explanation:
The government through the central bank can adopt a variety of measures to control the amount of money supply in the economy. The state uses a combination of monetary and fiscal policies to this effect.
In the given example, the federal government would not print more money due to the implications it has not only on the value of the currency but also on other macroeconomic variables such as interest rates and inflation.
By printing money, there would be an excess amount of money supply in the economy. That would make each dollar in the economy worth less than what it was before. This puts downward pressure on interest rates and boosts inflation as well.
Due to higher inflation, a greater amount of money would be required to continue with normal business which would again cause the need to further increase money supply. Using the law of simple demand and supply, the value of money would keep lowering as money supply is kept increasing. This is why a government might elect to not print money.
that statement is false
after both sides rest their cases, both the defendant's attorney and the plaintiff's attorney would each give a closing statement. They would most likely use this opportunity to appeal to both logic and emotion of the juries in order to gain support for the voting.
Answer:
Hewo Fellow Humans!!
Answer is down below!!
Explanation:
Plains provide better water facilities and easy availability of land for the production, housing, educational and service activities.
It is easy to set up buildings and working centres and road and railway networks on plains rather than on mountains and plateaus. People always get attracted towards better developed areas and since the plains are more populated and support more people than mountains or deserts or plateaus.
Hope this helps!! =3
Have a great day, evening, or night!! <3
~ XxGhostMosskitxX
