<u>Motion of an object with lot of inertia:</u>
All objects are immune to changes in orientation. This phenomenon is evident in all objects-inertia is present.
Inertia and mass are the major factors.
But are any objects more likely than others to avoid changes? Definitely yes!
There are various masses in the propensity of an object to avoid shifts in its movement. Weight is the quantity that depends only on an object's inertia. The more momentum an object possesses the more mass it has. A bigger body is more likely to stand up to changes in its movement.
Suppose on the physics demonstration bench, there seem to be two matching bricks. Nevertheless, one brick is made of concrete and the other brick is made of steel mould.
How can you say the brick had been the Styrofoam brick by raising the bricks? You should give the bricks the same push to change their movement. Brick with the least strength-and therefore brick with the least weight–is the brick that provides the easiest path.
Answer:
impacts of dependency theory
Explanation:
hope it helps
The correct answer is:
A. Confirming executive appointments
B. Holding impeachment trials
E. Approving international treaties.
Explanation:
The United States Senate is one of the two cameras of the Legislative branch, and is given exclusive powers established in the United States Constitution. Those exclusive powers are:
The power to confirm executive appointments: The President receives the advice and consent of the Senate in a vote process to appoint federal judges, executive positions and ambassadors.
The power to approve international treaties made by the President: Two-thirds of the Senate must vote in favor to approve international treaties, as part of the check and balances system, to restrain the power of the President.
The power to hold impeachment trials: The Senate holds impeachment trials when the House of Representatives decides to impeach an elected official, two-thirds votes are required to remove the officer.
I believe you're looking for manorialism.<span />
