Answer:
Hi
Serving: (a) In general. The process, which does not include a subpoena under Rule 4 or a subpoena under Rule 45, must be delivered by a United States marshal or a marshal deputy or by a person specially designated for that purpose, within the territorial limits of the state where the district court is located and, if authorized by federal statute, beyond those limits.
(b) Compliance with orders: Commitment of civil contempt. An order that commits a person for civil contempt of a decree can be delivered and executed in any district. Any other order in a civil contempt process can be delivered only in the state where the issuing court is located or in another place in the United States within 100 miles of where the order was issued.
Summons: (1) Content. A subpoena must: (A) name of the court and the parties; (B) be directed to the accused; (C) indicate the name and address of the plaintiff's lawyer or, if not indicated, of the plaintiff; (D) indicate the time within which the accused must appear and defend himself; (E) notify the defendant that the lack of appearance and defense may result in a default trial against the defendant for the compensation required in the complaint; (F) must be signed by the secretary; (G) that bears the seal of the court.
Subpoena: (a) In general. (1) Form and content. (A) Requirements: in general. Each citation must: (i) indicate the court from which it issued; (ii) indicate the title of the action and its civil action number; (iii) order each person to be told to do a specific time and place: attend and testify; produce designated documents, electronically stored information or tangible things in possession, custody or control of that person; or allow the inspection of premises; and (iv) establish the text of Rule 45 (d)
Consult the standard in https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp
Explanation:
The answer to your question is A, it is a because the Congress has the power to make any laws they want. Therefore the Supreme Court has the power to decide if the laws the congress made are unconstitutional.
Answer:
How the country would be different today if "separate but equal" were still the law include:
1. The Jim Crow laws would have ensured the disunity of the United States, with the Confederation of American States (south) separate from the United States of America (north).
2. The United States would have been a laughing stock of other nations of the world. It would not be acting as a bastion of democracy and industrial development, as it could not be pushing for democracy in other countries without practicing what it preached.
3. There would have been continuous unrest in the Confederation of American States (US South) and human development would have been hindered a lot, because people of color would be in everlasting revolt in that part of the American continent.
Explanation:
The Jim Crow laws were laws from the pit of hell that enforced racial segregation in the Southern part of the United States. It was instituted between the end of Reconstruction in 1877 after the civil war and the beginning of the civil rights movement in the 1950s. According to one Nebraska record in 1911, marriages were illegal between a white person and a person of color. This depicts the extent of the cruelty that was hoisted on the country by the Jim Crow laws.
