Answer:
1) Czar you would not be happy about the revolvolution as it was supposed to remove his power. As workers you would be happy, and hope for some better rights and living conditions. The soldiers were probably tired of war, and maybe wanted to come back home.
2) A treaty should try and bring peace and stability. A classic example is the treaty of versailles where it is a cause of WW2, it broke the german economy and country with the restriction. Maybe if the treaty were better for Germany we may not have had WW2.
3) If you were germany you would be angry that all the blame is put on you. You will find it unfair you have to pay a big amount of money to the other countries. The treaty feels like a big hard push for Germany, and is a reason WW2 started, and how Hitler managed to grab the power in Germany.
Answer:
The national origins quota system ended.
Explanation:
Migration refers to the movement of a group of people from one geographical region (location) to another geographical destination in search of better living conditions, work or social amenities.
Population change equation states that the change in the size of a population over a specific period of time is equal to the sum of the number of births and the number of immigrants that joined.
Mathematically, the population change equation is given by the formula;
Population Change = (Natality - Mortality) + (Immigration - Emigration)
The Immigration Act and Naturalization of 1965 is also referred to as the Hart-Celler Act and it was enacted by the IS Congress to abolish the previous quota system based on national origins in the United States of America.
Hence, an effect of the Immigration Act of 1965 was that it ended the national origins quota system.
Answer:
July 28, 1914 - November 11, 1918 which is 2 years,4 months and 17 days
BRAINLIEST PLSSSSS
Arnold J. Toynbee (1889 – 1975) was a British and philosopher remembered for his great “Study of History” which is a big work of 12 volumes that analyze 21 civilizations; their rises and falls.
His work is a combination of philosophical and objective thoughts, so this insures the combination of facts that are analyzed from two perspectives, because he is using concrete historical events combined with his philosophical and empirical ideas. That is why many historians, philosophers, sociologists, political scientists are interested in his books and how civilizations emerged, grew, declined and dissolve themselves.