1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
andre [41]
3 years ago
9

Tracy couldn't bare to go to another gymnastics class; they were so long, and she found them less interesting than reading. Whic

h of the words in the sentence is misspelled?
Social Studies
2 answers:
snow_tiger [21]3 years ago
7 0
Bare; it’s supposed to bear, as in withstand, not bare, as in naked or not having anything on
Sloan [31]3 years ago
5 0
After looking hard at the sentence, I figured out that "bare" is misspelled as it is being used in the wrong way. The way it is being used is to Un cover such as clothing. To "bear" is to withstand but if Tracy couldn't bear something then she couldn't stand another.
You might be interested in
The convert Saul would eventually exchange his Jewish name for the Greco-Roman name ___________, as he expanded his ministry to
Viktor [21]

Answer:

Paul

Explanation:

Saul of Tarsus was first seen in biblical accounts as he witnessed to the execution of Stephen, who was the first recorded martyr to the cause of Jesus Christ himself.  

Upon conversion to Christianity, he was given the name paul, which means small or humble. He remained a significant leader in the activities of the early Christian church.  

4 0
3 years ago
What democratic principles were advanced
TEA [102]
1. Rights come from God, not government

This Founding Principle is actually embedded in our Declaration of Independence: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

The Founders didn’t believe governments bestowed rights, nor were they an agent to protect rights—governments were the ones that abridged rights.

2. All political power emanates from the people

The Founders were strongly influenced by John Locke, who advocated government as a social contract. The term, will of the governed, encapsulates this concept, which means the people are boss. The power of the people is declared in the first three words of the Constitution, “We the people …” This principle is also the underlying basis for our Declaration of Independence, “governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.”

This principle dictated that conventions of the people were the only authorizing force to ratify the Constitution. Neither Congress nor the state legislatures had the power.

Delegate William Paterson, author of the New Jersey Plan, wrote, “What is a Constitution? It is the form of government, delineated by the mighty hand of the people, in which certain first principles of fundamental law are established.”

3. Limited representative republic

The Founders believed in limited government in the form of a representative republic. They distrusted a direct democracy, because they equated it to mob rule. James Madison constantly preached against any system that allowed special interests (factions) to gain control of the government. He showed that throughout history, majority factions tyrannized minorities, whether the minorities be based on race, wealth, religion, or even geography.

The Founders believed that to protect against government oppression, they must disperse power, and give each branch of government formidable checks on the authority of every other branch. By the end of the Constitutional Convention, the Founders also came to firmly believe that the states must act as a solid check on the national government. Last, monarchies had general power, so they would give the national government only delineated powers.

4. Written Constitution

If government is a social contract, and it has only limited power formally delegated by the people, then the contract—Constitution—must be in writing. The strongest proponent of a written constitution was Thomas Paine, who said, “[A]n unwritten constitution is not a constitution at all.” This may seem commonplace today, but England, the most powerful nation on earth, had no written constitution. This was different in America, however, where all thirteen states had a written constitution. This American tradition goes back to the Mayflower Compact. Our national heritage is a written constitution that sets the rules for governance between the people and their elected representatives. The Founders intent was that this contract would only be changed through the amendment process.

5. Private Property Rights

The Founders were influenced by Adam Smith, and were firm believers in private property rights. In their minds, private property rights were intertwined with liberty. True liberty would never allow the government to come at any time and take a person’s property. That would be Divine Right, which they had fought eight bloody years to escape.

James Madison said, “As a man is said to have a right to his property, he may be equally said to have a property in his rights.” He meant that even if a person owned nothing else, he still owned his rights, which were the most valuable property of all.

The Constitutional Convention delegates didn’t agree on everything. In fact, they possibly only agreed on these Founding Principles. After all, they did argue for four months about the design of the government.

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What sentencing guidelines require a judge to provide an explanation for any deviation?​?
Yakvenalex [24]
<span>a. presumptive sentencing guidelines</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Analyse THREE actions that the South African Government is doing to
Veseljchak [2.6K]

Explanation:

All they are doing is redistribution, not creation. They are enforcing fewer and fewer people to subsidise and pay for more and more people who do not pay for services. Meanwhile the service infrastructure is ageing and in the process of collapse as it was never designed for so many people, Lack of upgrade and maintenance is the last nail in the coffin.

Redistribution does not work. If you tax people more and more they will stop using the service and find alternatives. Look how many people are going off-grid. I am off grid. It now works out cheaper, I don’t have to suffer load shedding and water cutoffs, and I dont have to pay more and more and subsidise more and more people for less and less service. I don’t care anymore about their loadshedding and huge tariff hikes. The more they charge the faster I pay off my off grid system.

Because they insist on subsidising so many people, there is no money left for capital infrastructure. Policies that drive people off grid means that less and less of those prepared to pay are now contributing to as service they no longer want any part of.

The ANC has only themselves to blame for the utter collapse. Their policies, incompetence, cadre deployment of incompetents to government have brought about ruin. Apartheid left them functioning infrastructure that did well to last until now, well past the design life, and a well run efficient civil service. It shows how good their build quality and plans were. The stuff put in by ANC BEE contractors lasts as long as a Made in China product. All they have done is given equal access to less and less so you have access to a failing collapsing product with no hope of salvation unless EVERYONE pays a fair price by what they use, and the ANC stops stealing that revenue. To expect them to stop stealing is like asking a cow to stop eating grass. It is their nature to graze on the veld maintained by others, not to grow anything themselves.

6 0
3 years ago
The great compromise reached at the constitutional convention of 1787 dealt with the issue of
Ksju [112]

Answer & Explanation:

Remember that at the Constitutional convention, states with large populations clashed with states having small populations. The issue was over representation in Congress. ... The Great Compromise created each: equal representation in the U.S. Senate and a group based on a state's population in the House of Representatives.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What elements of Renaissance culture show secular ideas
    8·2 answers
  • What did Comanche culture center on?
    8·1 answer
  • Why did the Australian government restrict immigration after it
    9·1 answer
  • Constitution amendments 6 &amp; 7. I need help with these few blanks please!
    5·1 answer
  • Why don't banks have all the money that people have deposited at any one time? A Because banks steal the money from their custom
    15·2 answers
  • Demand Practice Problems 1. Which of the following best describes the law of demand? (A)The price of a good increases when the d
    10·1 answer
  • What is a characteristic of the great barier reef
    12·2 answers
  • How does a country's government and economic system influence its power over other countries?
    5·1 answer
  • Willll some one please help meeee I'm running out of time
    6·1 answer
  • Between 476 and 1050 C.E., all of the following thematic factors caused the spread of Christianity. However this map emphasizes
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!