Answer:
The police officers should have shut down the crime scene immediately and taken statements from JonBenet's parents. One key mistake was not getting full statements from parents John and Patricia Ramsey the day of the crime. Another mistake was the former police chief said that the girl's parents seemed to show unusual behavior but clarified that could have been due to a number of reasons.
Explanation:
Answer:
Those circumstances that would cause a reasonable person to believe that entry (or other relevant prompt action) was necessary to prevent physical harm to the officers or other persons, the destruction of relevant evidence, the escape of a suspect, or some other consequence improperly frustrating legitimate law
hope it helps you
The rate of violent hate crime in 2005 was less than the rate of violent crime in 2019.
<h3>Comparing the rates of violent hate crime across the years. </h3>
- Violent hate crime was at a rate of just over 0.8% in 2005.
- In 2019, this had risen to a rate of 1%.
This comparison is not surprising because there had been a downward trend in violent hate crime but this began to rise in 2016 till it reached the rate of 1.0% in 2019.
<h3>Motivations and perpetrators of those hate crimes </h3>
- Motivated by race and ethnicity.
- Perpetrated by far right activists.
With the election of Donald Trump, far right activists gained renewed momentum as they felt he was on their side. As a result, they increased their tendency to engage in violent hate crime.
Find out more on far right activists at brainly.com/question/511410.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
This is not true of experiential reality. Therefore it is false. Experiential reality is different from what is described in this question. Instead what is described is Agreement reality.
In experiential reality, we have to experience reality or something first before we can establish it as real or true. What we experience could be physical, but through direct experience we are able to know if it is true.
answer:
social contracts can be explicit, such as laws.
what you CAN and CANNOT do.
example: if you are going 80 miles an hour in a speed zone where the speed limit is 45 you will get fined or you will get a ticket, or you could even go to jail.
rules are implicit, such as raising one's hand in class to speak.
example: the most that could happen is that you don't get to ask your question if you don't raise your hand.
explanation:
the u.s. constitution is often cited as an explicit example of part of america's social contract. it sets out what the government can and cannot do.
any good social contact has/is:
values/principles
clear and specific
has consequences that relate as directly to the rule as possible
psa:
*please do not just copy my answer it was meant to help you not just give you anything to put down!
*if you think my answer is good or will get an a please give me brainliest or high stars.
*love yourself. you're beautiful, i promise.
thank you,
please treat people with kindness, wear a mask, and have a lovely day.
