If a certain household earns and spends $24,000 per year and, on average, holds a money balance of $6,000, then the velocity of money for this household is 4.
A household consists of one or more people who live in the same dwelling and share meals. It can also consist of a single-family or another group. Households are the basic unit of analysis in many social, microeconomic, and government models and are important to economics and inheritance.
The definition of household relates to family or social units living together, or household behavior. You and your family members who live with you are an example of your household. Budgets and checkbooks are examples of household budget tools.
Learn more about household here:brainly.com/question/9417571
#SPJ4
Answer: Factee
Explanation:
This is a factorage transaction in which Justin will pay Miguel to act as an intermediary who will sell the baseball glove and receive a commission. That commission is known as a Factorage.
In a Factorage transaction, the intermediary being paid to sell the product is considered to be the Factor and the person who will pay for the product to be sold is the Factee. Justin in this scenario is paying for the baseball glove to be sold and so is the Factee.
Explanation:
1) Famous celebrities and the people with lots of money are often seen with workers round them for their household chores/tasks. Although they are paying money for the work they could have done by themselves but if we analyze closely, they are actually taking advantage of the opportunity cost. The time when they were suppose to do the household work, now they are performing other task in that time which will be giving them much greater economic benefit, taking advantage of the concept of opportunity cost. For example, Cristiano Ronaldo can focus on his workout and daily exercise instead of making daily meals for himself, so he should have hired someone to do the meal work for him while he perform his workout which will help him on the field and will earn him much money.
2) Yes, it is possible for 2 countries to benefit from trade as a whole because they can get into an agreement by allowing free trade between the countries, for example, both the countries could agree that all the trade which will be executed between them would be tax free and no duties will be paid on them. This way the trade numbers would increase and industrialization would take place to meet the export/import orders. On the contrary, trading individually can be not so beneficial because there will be no free trade agreements between individuals i.e. no free lunches, that is why it could cost individuals much more than they can make money out of it.
3) One of the main reasons to oppose policies that restrict trade among the nations is that GDP. GDP is a measure of growth in any country, therefore when there will be no trade among countries, it would result in less productions of goods and services which which lead to less industrialization, which then will result to low employment and more unemployment, ultimately resulting in very low growth for any country and since growth is the only way forward for any nation, economists oppose policies that restrict trade among countries/nations.
I hope this detailed answer of mine help the poster.
Thank You and Good Luck.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Richard De George is known for his work in business ethics. He discussed the conditions to permit whistle-blowing.
According to De George, whistle-blowing is permitted as moral authority when these 3 conditions are met:
1) The harm that will be done by the product [or company action] to the public is severe and considerable.
2) The engineer has told their superiors about their concern
3) The engineer has not received a satisfactory answer from their supervisors and also from other superiors and he is left with no other alternatives.
According to De George, whistle-blowing is mandatory as moral duty when these 2 additional conditions are met:
4) The engineer must have documented evidence that would convince a reasonable observer that his or her view is correct
5) There must be strong evidence that making the information public will in fact prevent the threaten serious harm.
The California “standard form” policy of title insurance on
real property insures against loss occasioned by a forgery in the chain of
recorded title.
To add, standard form policy is an insurance policy form that is
designed to be used by many different insurers and has exactly the same
provisions, regardless of the insurer issuing the <span>policy.</span>
