Answer:
8.76%
Explanation:
Using the CAPM formula:
Ke = Rf + Beta Factor * Risk premium
Here
Rf is 5%,
Beta Factor is 1.6
And
Risk Premium is 6%
By putting values, we have:
Ke = 5% + 1.6 * 6%
Ke = 14.6%
Now we will find new firm's cost of equity under 40% debt by simply multiplying it with the equity percentage:
Weighted Cost of Equity = 14.6% * 60% = 8.76%
The contribution margin is the difference between sales volume and variable costs.
Or to put it another way: the contribution margin is the profits of a company, without considering the fixed costs.
We have then:
MC = $ 120 -60 $ = $ 60
Answer:
the contribution margin per unit is $ 60
Answer:
(A) I, II, and IV only
Explanation:
The Material Requirements Planning MRP is used to calculate tha materials needed for production. It may be done by software but it can be done without any technological tool.
The most important information for MRP is about the available inventory for future production, in this way the company will know what materials are needed for future production. To provide the materials on time it is necessary to know the master schedules of production, making sure that the supplies will be ready on time for manufacturing process. Finally, the accurate Bills of materials are used as a check list to verify that there is not any pending component for the production process. Even when the MRP may include costs, it is not a vital component for the system and some companies can have MRP without including costs.
Answer:
The correct answer is Inductive reasoning.
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is a form of reasoning in which the truth of the premises supports the conclusion, but does not guarantee it. A classic example of inductive reasoning is:
- All the crows observed so far have been black
- Therefore, all crows are black
In principle, it could be that the next crow observed is not black. In contrast to deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning has the advantage of being expansive, that is, the conclusion contains more information than is contained in the premises. Given its expansive nature, inductive reasoning is very useful and frequent in science and in everyday life. However, given its fallible nature, its justification is problematic. When are we justified in making an inductive inference, and concluding, for example, that all crows are black from a limited sample of them? What distinguishes a good inductive argument from a bad one? These and other related problems give rise to the problem of induction, whose validity and importance has continued for centuries.
