Answer:
The Ghanaian example has shown that the issue of "personnel not facilities being the bane of quality public primary education" is very much debatable. Ab initio, the two contributors are important in the delivery of quality public primary education. Therefore, I will allocate the importance and the bane of quality education 50/50 to each of these aspects of education delivery.
Educational success cannot be achieved without the personnel being themselves of the highest quality, not only in terms of learning, but also in moral and ethical character formation and standing. This is important because education cannot be received without someone imparting it, and even some other persons helping the teachers to impart the desired knowledge and learning. A teacher or support staff who is morally depraved cannot impart quality education, especially at the primary level with pupils in their formative and tender years.
In the same light, nobody can expect the personnel to deliver quality education in a vacuum. The infrastructure or facilities are key in the delivery of quality education by quality personnel. These facilities are all-embracing and include many of the teaching aids required for successful education delivery, including the remuneration of the personnel. This makes this subject intricately intertwined. One cannot discuss an aspect without touching the other. The two must be effectively balanced in order to produce good results.
Explanation:
Pupils at the primary education level need teachers who will bear witness to what they teach and not just talkers. Good example teaches better than words. In the same way, good learning and teaching facilities aid in learning. That is why they are called learning aids. Education should not only be informative but should equally be "performative."
Autobiography. This includes the important points/details about a person - crucial people and events they have encountered as well.
The admission of Alabama as a slave state was the main point of controversy that led to the Missouri Compromise. After Alabama wanted to be part of the Union by being a slave state, the number of free state to slave state became equal to 11. This angered the free states and the members of the Congress that were in favor of slavery free states. The only way to stop the coming civil war was the Missouri Compromise. If Missouri was admitted as the slave state then the balance of equality would tilt towards the slave states and this would result in a big clash. To stop this from happening, the Missouri Compromise was the middle path that was chosen.
I think that the answer is D
