The first two scenarios are <span>Hierarchical control and the third scenario is Decentralized control. </span>
Answer:
Confront theories predictions with evidence
Explanation:
To test economic theories, economists would observe real behavior and test it with data from the real world. Which would in turn provide evidence based on what is being tested. Confronting theories predictions with evidence is a pointer to the fact that economic theories are verifiable and their validity can be tested.
The answer is the solution that best solves the problem is selected.
During the solution implementation step you should already have determined which solution you would apply to solve the problem that you encounter. By determining which solution to implement, you are on your way to solving the problem that requires your decision-making. If the solution proves to be unsuitable later on, you can refine it later on.
Answer:
$1,901,385
Explanation:
First unit produced by lambda took 5,000 hours to produce and required $30,000 worth of materials and equipment usage.
The second unit took 4,500 hours and used $24,000 worth of materials and equipment usage.
learning rate = time needed to produce second unit / time needed to produce first unit = 4,500 hours / 5,000 hours = 90%
materials and equipment usage rate = $24,000 / $30,000 = 80%
using the attached table of cumulative values, we can determine the cumulative improvement factors needed to solve this question:
Olsan's accumulated cost for producing 20 more guidance controls
-
work hours = 4,500 x 14.61 (90% and 20 units) x $25 per hour = $1,643,625
- materials and equipment = $24,000 x 10.74 (95% and 20 units) = $257,760
- total = $1,901,385