The sentences are an example of <span>a hasty generalization. Because it has conclusion without detailed explanation. This sentence just has general statements with hasty conclusion.</span>
Answer:
C. No faith is strong. Only strong have biceps. No faith has biceps.
Explanation:
The question above is related to the topic of "Syllogism." This is a type of reasoning which consists of a <em>premise or</em><em> </em><em>premises</em> and a <em>conclusion.</em> The conclusion is logically derived from the premises. In order to do this, the two premises have to be joined together.
Among the choices above, letter B<em> shows a conclusion that has been logically derived from the first two premises.</em> Its premises support the conclusion.
<em>"No faith has biceps."</em> is a valid argument because it is supported by a premise <em>("No faith is strong.")</em> and another premise <em>("Only strong have biceps.")</em>.
"Only strong have biceps" also means that "All biceps are strong."
Answer:
i sadly dont know what words are in the passage, so if this dosent help just comment the passege but here goes nothing ig...
Explanation:
look for descriptive words that describe whats around the setting such as smells colors or objects
<span>The Victorian Era spanned the rule of Queen Victoria. The Era was a long stretch of peace, thriving, "refined sensibilities" and national fearlessness for the United Kingdom. A few researchers date the start of the period as far as sensibilities and political worries to the entry of the Reform Act 1832.</span>
