Statement that describes how Eileen Collins is different in the two texts is
The article focuses on the barriers Collins faced as a pilot while the interview focuses on the equality of women pilots.
Explanation:
The interview “Eileen Collins – NASA's First Female Shuttle Commander to Lead Next Shuttle Mission” and the article “Eileen Collins Is in Control” are both about Eileen Collins but they focus on very different parts of her life and her persona.
The article is about the life and times of Collins as a person and her ambitions and things that she went through to be who she was while the interview saw her more as an achiever and someone important whose opinions were valued over their story.
This view is not plausible because god is not plausible.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
It's not important to see a photo of Orson Wells. And who cares about the population of the United States. It has nothing to do with the topic. And same with a movie clip about aliens. So that leaves us with A. An audio clip of the actual radio broadcast.
Answer: "A school district can bring in hundreds of thousands of dollars in revenue from the ads over the course of several years." & "Ads would need to be limited to those that target adults outside of the school buses and not the children inside."
Explanation:
The sentence "In fact, putting limitations on anything helps make things more beneficial for people." sounds short with no proof or evidence.
"Student(s) may have thought this made a good point that helps support the argument that ads should be allowed on school buses." They may have given some evidence, but it's not the strongest.
"An advertising program can greatly benefit a school district as long as there are limitations put on the ads." This is basically just rewording the claim.
The other two sentences are correct because it shows strong proof of the reasons in a understanding way.
:first person P.O.V
: third person limited
:third person omniscient
this is correct on brainly
