The correct answer is the second choice - peer review process in scientific research exists in order to verify that the conclusions that are made are supported by the data. You cannot make a valid conclusion if you do not have enough evidence or data to prove it - this is why your peers have to go through your research to make sure everything is done according to the rules of scientific research.
Hope this helps.
Evolution can be defined as the process of changes in the genetic pool of a population over time. The process of natural selection operates the evolution of any population. Evolution acts upon a whole population instead upon on single individual. A single individual doesn't evolve, instead ratios of the genetic types within a population changes when it is evolving, and eventually, complete evolution occurs.
Hence, the given answer is 'true'.
Answer:
d
Explanation:
When considering the frequency of the potential alleles of a gene in a population, the total must add up to 1. Think of it like percentages. an allele frequency of 0.3 means 30% of the population carry it (out of a possible 100%).
We know that the frequency of c1 is 0.3. Lets take each option and see if it can be true
a) cannot be less than 0.3. - false. It <em>could </em>be less than 0.3. For example, it could be 0.1, meaning the frequency of allele c3 would be 0.6 (because 0.3 + 0.1 + 0.6 = 1)
b) cannot be greater than 0.3. - false. It <em>could </em>be greater than 0.3. For example, it could be 0.5, meaning the frequency of allele c3 would have to be 0.2 (because 0.3 + 0.5 + 0.2 = 1)
c) is 0.7. - false. It <em>can't </em>be 0.7, because that would mean that the frequency of c3 is 0. (0.7 + 0.3 = 1)
d) cannot be greater than 0.7. - true. It <em>cannot </em>be greater than 0.7, because that would mean that the frequency of c3 is 0. (0.7 + 0.3 = 1)
probably younger.----less sediment would mean less time.
Pericardium or pericardial sac.
Hope This Helps!
