Answer:
1.freedom of mass media
2.free campaign
3.freedom of participation of citizen in election
The southern delegates to the Constitutional Convention were willing to accept the Three-Fifths Compromise because it increased the political influence of the South.
<h3>What is the Three-fifths compromise?</h3>
By the Three-fifths compromise, the Northern and Southern state's delegates at the United States Constitutional Convention of 1787 agreed that three-fifth of the population of slaves would be counted in determining representation and number of seats in the Congress.
It also would determine how much each state would pay in taxes.
The three-fifths compromise allowed Southern states more Representatives and more presidential electoral votes than if slaves had not been counted although slaves had no voting rights.
Therefore, the Three-fifths compromise increased the political influence of the South by granting them more representation and electoral power.
Read more about southern delegates accepting the three-fifths compromise at brainly.com/question/7663707
#SPJ1
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
The start of the Cold War and the subsequent Second Red Scare instilled fear and intimidation in American culture, to the point where individuals were afraid to question the assumption that the US was always on the right side of history. This is an form of manipulation which is why I believe American citizens were manipulated by the fear factor presented in Cold War media.
Hello, Help Is on The Way pal!!!
Answer:
Largest cities
Nº City Population
2 Abu Dhabi 1,807,000
Explanation:
Look Above!!
Thank You and Happy Labor Day!!
~
Your Friend
Tetram
The statement about the cases such as Lochner v. New York (1905) and Hammer v. Dagenhart (1918) is: False.
<h3 /><h3>What was the Supreme Court Ruling?</h3>
The ruling by the Supreme court in both cases gave more rights to the individuals involved than the federal or state government.
In the Lochner v. New York (1905) case, the supreme court ruled that it was unlawful for the New York State Law to set the maximum working hours for bakers because it violated their rights.
In the second case, the court ruled against a federal law that promoted child labor.
Learn more about the principle of self-government here:
brainly.com/question/6347343
