1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
valentinak56 [21]
3 years ago
13

Dr. Henry Kissinger's interpretation of "Realpolitik" is based on the assumption that

History
1 answer:
saveliy_v [14]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The correct answer is A. Dr. Henry Kissinger's interpretation of "Realpolitik" is based on the assumption that  the balance of power in the world and international stability are more important than respect for human rights.

Explanation:

Realpolitik is a way of doing politics in which the costs and benefits of a certain policy are examined in a sober way. Ideology, political-philosophical considerations or ethics are left out of that consideration. Realpolitik is therefore a form of political realism. The term is generally used in a pejorative sense but is also used more positively by technocratic politicians. Proponents of realpolitik believe that ideology should not have a prominent place in politics, because it can lead to dangerous power games.

You might be interested in
Which statement best describes women’s legal rights in the United States during the early 1800s?
inessss [21]

Answer:

Women had few legal rights, and were barred from the court system

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How is the communism of the Cuba similar to Marx’s ideas? How is it different from them?
joja [24]

Answer:

In the first place, it must be said that despite his immense intellectual contributions and his deep analysis of 19th century capitalism, Charles Marx didn´t leave any book or writing outlining how a communist society would look like. He only wrote once that in communism, every person will go from receiving according to their capacity to receiving according to their needs. This is a very vague idea. So, is Cuba true to Marx? It´s hard to say. Paramount leader Fidel Castro built a Communist Party and a communist state following the Soviet model. In orthodox Marxist practice, the government is the dictatorship of the proletariat, of the workers. What we have actually seen in Cuba is a dictatorship of Fidel Castro and his brother Raúl Castro, in which they and a small elite of top party, state and military officials hold power exclusively.

Prosperity in Cuba? Definitely no. The Cuban experiment is a failure after 60 years of communist rule; the Cuban economy is not dynamic, it is dominated by the higly ineffective state-run mammoths, many Cubans live in nearly-poverty, food rationing continues, it is tecnologically backward. No democratic freedoms. Most young people want to emigrate and settle in the US or elsewhere. The traditional Soviet-like economic model, a command economy, is a system that can´t create wealth and can´t lead to prosperity because its ideological foundations are wrong; only an economy based on a free-market and private enterprise can generate and sustain wealth. The American embargo is usually blamed by Cuban leader as the main reason for this situation, but Cuba can import technology from other countries, trade with them and get investments. So, why does it continue to lag behind?

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
How are the powers of the legislative branch held in check? Select two options.
VMariaS [17]

Answer:

The legislative branch of government is in charge of creating and passing laws.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
From 1969 to 1972, Nixon and Kissinger pursued a three-pronged approach to Vietnam that included the payment of millions of doll
zheka24 [161]

Answer:

Capital D

Explanation:

Dss nuts, find the answer urself. you go to school for a reason right?

5 0
3 years ago
What was the main reason that Congress passed the Indian Removal Act?
emmainna [20.7K]

Answer:

<u>The main reason was the dispute over the lands of the Native tribes. </u>

Explanation:

The governments of several states of the United States felt that the presence of the tribes was a threat to peace and security, because many Native Americans had fought against the United States in previous wars, often armed by foreign nations such as Great Britain and Spain. Other white settlers and land speculators simply wanted the land that was being occupied by the tribes. Therefore, these governments wanted all tribal lands within their borders to be placed under state jurisdiction.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In 1992, pakistan amended its constitution and made the _______ the supreme law of the land.
    6·1 answer
  • which two countries started exploring north america after Christopher Columbus journey to the new world.
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a success of the Carter Administration
    6·1 answer
  • Help pls idk pls pls
    6·1 answer
  • Need help on this question
    13·2 answers
  • Where do the majority of people live in south asia
    8·2 answers
  • 9. Why is it important for Americans to pay their taxes?
    8·1 answer
  • What did the government issue to help finance the war ?
    15·1 answer
  • Please help me. I will give Brainlist
    15·2 answers
  • HELP i am doing a quiz and here is my question
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!