1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Papessa [141]
3 years ago
10

We follow rules and be safe on the road

Law
1 answer:
Galina-37 [17]3 years ago
6 0

yes we follow rules and be safer in roads .Here are a few basic road safety rules for you can begin with.

Know Your Signals. ...

Stop, Look, And Cross. ...

Pay Attention – Listen. ...

Don't Run On Roads. ...

Always Use Sidewalks. ...

Crossroads and Pedestrian Crossing. ...

Never Stick Hands Outside The Vehicle. ...

Never Cross Road At Bends.

You might be interested in
If you are preparing to tow a small trailer behind your vehicle, you are
loris [4]

A) At least one brake light if the trailer hides the brake lights on your vehicle.

This is a requirement in order to have a legally functional trailer tow.

I hope this helps! :)

4 0
2 years ago
The board nursing will typically use mediation to resolve first instances of relatively minor violations
butalik [34]

It is a true statement that the board nursing will typically use mediation to resolve first instances of relatively minor violations.

<h3>What is a mediation?</h3>

This refers to an interactive process whereby a third party helps in resolving conflict between disputing parties through the use of specialized communication.

Therefore, that act of mediating by the board will help to resolve first instances of relatively minor violations.

Read more about mediation

<em>brainly.com/question/25850228</em>

#SPJ1

8 0
2 years ago
What are the benefits of having several state permits a practice that is generally banned throughout the United States?
iragen [17]
This is when states become a “laboratories for Democracy”. This means that while federal law may say one thing about a certain issue/policy, there is sometimes overlap in jurisdiction that allow states to go against the Federal Government. A benefit of states being laboratories for Democracy is that they are able to implement policies that they feel is best for citizens of their respected state. A quality example of this would be the legality of marijuana. While marijuana is still illegal at the federal level, many states (colorado, california, washington, etc) have decided that the consumption of marijuana is legal for recreational use, despite federal law that prohibits it.
4 0
3 years ago
Mr. Lynn, an agent for Acme Insurance, Inc. thinks that, since state laws are preempted concerning the marketing of Medicare hea
n200080 [17]

What might you, as his colleague, advise him concerning the type of scrutiny he will be under is: d. Organizations sponsoring Medicare health plans are responsible for the behavior of their contracted representatives and will be conducting monitoring activities to ensure compliance with all applicable Federal law and guidance and plan policies. Furthermore, state agent licensure laws are not preempted and he must abide by their requirements.

<h3>What is medicare?</h3>

A medicare can be defined as a health insurance coverage that help to cover medical expenses.

Based on the given scenario what  you might  advise him concerning the type of scrutiny he will be under is that company that is incharge of the medicare plan are the one incharge of the representatives behavior.

Therefore the correct option is D.

Learn more about medicare here:brainly.com/question/1960701

#SPJ1

8 0
1 year ago
Decided during the Constitutional Convention of 1787, this accommodation onrepresentation in the proposed US House of Representa
miv72 [106K]

Answer:

The correct answer is A. Decided during the Constitutional Convention of 1787, this accommodation onrepresentation in the proposed US House of Representatives tacitly acknowledged slavery and kept the Southern slave states from rejecting the Constitution. It was called the Three-Fifths Compromise.

Explanation:

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise reached between delegates from the southern states and delegates from the northern states during the Constitutional Convention in 1787. The debate centered on on the fact whether slaves would be counted at the same time as determining the total population of a state to determine legislative representation and for taxative functions. The matter was important, while that population number then used to determine how many seats the state would have in the House of Representatives for the next ten years. The effect was to give the southern states one-third more seats in Congress and one-third more votes they would otherwise have, allowing slave interests to largely dominate the United States government until 1865.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why might a scientist choose to do field work instead of a laboratory experiment?
    7·1 answer
  • Which type of injury prevention begins after an injury and is done to limit the damage caused by the injury?
    8·1 answer
  • उपलक्ष्यमा पठाइन शुरु
    12·1 answer
  • This question is from Business Law
    7·1 answer
  • Which supreme court case did the U.S. supreme court rule that
    13·1 answer
  • During the straight-in parking aspect of the driving skills test, what should
    13·1 answer
  • The reasonable suspicion law derived from The Terry Vs Ohio Supreme Court ruling ?
    11·1 answer
  • The thermostat is the gauge on your dashboard for
    14·1 answer
  • Question 19 of 20
    5·1 answer
  • What<br> can Congress do to check the President?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!