I think the Supreme Courts interpretations of free speech have become more libertarian over time. For example, free speech on LGBT matters would have been strictly prohibited a century ago.
Most because getting out of jail/prison don't really know what to do with themselves after leaving because it's hard for them to adjust your life choices. most places of work won't hire you and it becomes harder to do stuff like buy a house or apartment. so most people do what they did best before prison. Do illegal business
Answer: I mean...yeah
Explanation: He shot her and he already had some blame behind it. But to me it seems like his eyes is playing tricks on him for the 3rd sentence.
Answer:
One who engages in categorical moral thinking is likely to approach the trolley car case by focusing on:
e) Whether diverting the trolley car would violate people's rights.
Explanation:
Immanuel Kant (1724 - 1804) proposed that a person should always respect the humanity in others and that the person should only act in accordance with rules that could hold for everyone. For example, he claimed that people have a duty to do the right thing even if that action produces a bad result. Thus, telling a lie in order to save a friend from jail is considered to be morally reprehensible by Kantism. For Kant, therefore, a person is doing something good if they are taking a morally right action.
Answer:
Since biological fluids, such as semen, saliva, urine and others fluoresce, and any of these fluids could find their way onto the fingertips that leave fingerprints at crime scenes, an 'invisible' or latent fingerprint may be revealed by fluorescence