The printing press originated in Germany. It first took part in allowing for monasteries to copy bibles on a large scale as copies used to be made elegantly by hand. The former process that produced copies of books were too expensive for people of average wealth to afford. The printing press allowed more people to afford books due their "mass" production. This in turn increased literacy rates, since more people could now afford books and wished to read the bible and other popular works. Later on the printing press contributed to the formation of the United States of America as it allowed for important intellectuals to rapidly spread information about opposition to Britain. One such piece mass produced that is given some credit for the most immediate cause to the Revolution was Thomas Paine's Common Sense. Later on the printing press also became important as newspapers and magazines became popular along with yellow journalism which was mass produced due to the printing press. Basically throughout history it was the first form of social media which plagued society with information that caused wars and spread information rapidly from new scientific advancements and such. In fact the printing press mass producing journals, newspaper, and magazines can be directly related to the increase in world literacy, Revolutionary War, Spanish American War, WW1, WW2, and many many more events
Option A. The disadvantage that secondary sources have is that they are created by people who have never experienced the historical period they describe.
<h3>What is meant by secondary sources?</h3>
This is the term that is used to describe the data that are known to already be in existence. These are the types of data that can be gotten from journals or from large government data base.
These types of data are very unlike the primary data that the researcher has to source and create for himself. The primary data would be gotten directly from the field by the researcher who wants to carry out an experiment to determine a phenomenon.
Read more on secondary data here: brainly.com/question/14806486
#SPJ1
Complete question
Which of the following describes a disadvantage secondary sources have compared to primary sources? A.They are created by people who have never experienced the historical period they describe. B.They are extremely rare and much harder for historians to locate. C.They do not rely on historical evidence to support their conclusions. D.They focus too closely on a single piece of evidence instead of providing summaries.
Answer:
The answer is probably A.
