Answer:
Freedom of religion is abused by some churches
There is a famous maxim: ‘the nearer the church, the farther from God’. This maxim aptly describes the state of most of the churches across the globe.
The churches impose outdated, parochial, orthodox limitations on religion, seekers of truth. The most absurd aspect of these limitations is distortion of the word of God given by enlightened Messiahs, Prophets, Gurus, and Messengers of God. The churches force people to pay more attention to rituals and services than on GOD. Seeking God with all one’s heart, mind, and body is less important than religious ceremonies, hollow prayer services. Most of the religious formalities conducted are devoid of sincere devotion, love, and reverence to God.
Hence, in spite of so many churches across the globe, there is no real God in them – only formalities. All the Messengers of God praised and worshipped God; but churches praise Messengers only. No Messenger of God intended to be worshipped and be the seekers’ ultimate goal. They intended the seekers to consecrate themselves to God realization. They gave the message of universal brotherhood of man and Fatherhood of God. They instructed mankind to see God in all and all in God. But churches have their own doctrines to promote. As a result there are certain clashes among people following different churches.
Churches should spread the divine messages of divine Masters and Messengers of God without any fanaticism. They should give unrestricted freedom to seekers and God should be the only priority. Only then churches all across will fulfill their purposes.
Explanation:
hope this helps
The two events that spurred the need to chart new maritime routes are the following : Europeans developed the economic system of mercantilism and needed reserves of gold and silver ; and Europe witnessed a period that historians refer to as a "dark age."
The correct answer is <span>all the older soldiers who stayed safe and away from the battlefield
The narrator says that fathers and young sons will all die in the battlefield but those soldiers that avoided the battlefield would toddle off back home after the war and would die peacefully in their bad. The narrator says that he would sit with majors at the base and wouldn't participate. It's a critique of the system where young people die while powerful men sit around.</span>
Bryan was the last of the Great Political Orators in some ways. He could speak at great length on any topic, using powerful imagery, often of a religious nature, to audiences raised on such language and imagery.
Unfortunately, the telegraph already was encouraging economy of language, and the radio would make long speeches less useful than shorter ones which reached the point quickly. People in churches no longer spent hours listening to a single sermon, and those who followed the earsteps of Abraham Lincoln learned that eloquence was not a matter of length, but of substance.
The “Cross of Gold” speech which he thought would propel him to the Presidency would not work today.
The only orators today who speak interminably tend to be dictatorial in nature, in love with their own voice, and whose followers dote on every word, no matter how repetitious. Bryan was leagues above that, but someone who seeks his skill will learn why society has passed the skills of the long-sermoned preacher by.
C because i have done this question and got it right
