<u>Answer:</u>
<em>B. Chamberlain and Nehru both appeal to the economic interests of their audience, but Chamberlain is appealing to a desire for power, while Nehru is appealing to a sense of social justice.</em>
<em></em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
From the above passage it is evident that Chamberlain has failed to comprehend a united India, while on the other hand Nehru is more focused on delivering social justice to each and everyone. It is evident that Chamberlain has a pessimistic tone about the entire concept of “unity in diversity”. He believed that it was a utopian idea to unite a nation that’s so diverse and in pieces. On the other hand Nehru believed in this very utopian idea of one nation.
Supreme Court justices, court of appeals judges, and district court judges are nominated by the President and confirmed by the United States Senate, as stated in the Constitution. The names of potential nominees are often recommended by senators or sometimes by members of the House who are of the President's political party.
The correct answer is: A) William Wilberforce.
Explanation:
William Wilberforce (1759 - 1833) was an English politician who is remembered as one of the leaders of the <em>anti-slavery movement</em>.
He was converted to Christianism, and had as spiritual leader a former slave trader John Newton, this was one of the main reasons he became defendant of the slaves.<em> He fought in the House of Commons for the abolition of slavery</em>, but his first bill to abolish slave trade was defeated instantly by 163 votes to 88. It was until 1807 when Wilberforce achieved success and his bill to abolish slave trade was passed by 283 to 16.
In 1823 <em>Anti Slavery Society </em>was formed and William Wilberforce joined the movement, but he was already retired so he didn't played an important part in this movement.
