Could you please explain your query at the moment it is quite queer and difficult to understand
A. It is impossible to make an interpretive claim about this question.
Explanation:
- A good historical analysis is not allowing historians to make presumptions on this type of questions.
- It is hard to create a conclusion and create generalizations, because many factors needs to be taken into consideration.
- It is also important to escape the conclusions such as worst or best battles...
Learn more on World War II on
brainly.com/question/1168232
brainly.com/question/2838610
#learnwithBrainly
A person complains that the court ignored evidence relevant to the case which affected the outcome
Early in the morning on August 29, 2005, Hurricane Katrina struck the Gulf Coast of the United States. When the storm made landfall, it had a Category 3 rating on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Scale–it brought sustained winds of 100–140 miles per hour–and stretched some 400 miles across
Answer:
d. Refusing to testify to prevent self-incrimination.
Explanation:
Under the United States Constitution, the "Fifth Amendment" is the right of everyone, more specifically a defendant, to remain silent when questioned so as not to provide any information that can be used to incriminate him/her in the trial. It guarantees the individual of every right not to answer any questions, and maintain his silence.
So, pleading the Fifth means refusing to provide any answers to the questions asked so that he will not provide any information that can be used against him/her. This amendment is also the very basis of the "Miranda Rights" of the American Constitution. And lastly, this right can only be invoked in any legal process.
