Answer:
In Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court <u><em>ruled that bans on dangerous speech were constitutional.</em></u>
Explanation:
In the 1919 Supreme Court case of Schenck v. the United States, the court deemed the actions of Charles Schenck and Elizabeth Baer as unconstitutional. It deemed them criminals for trying to obstruct the government's drafting of men for war and that it is an act against the security of the nation.
This case revolves around the claim that the obstruction of Schenck and Baer's free speech was unconstitutional and they have the right to express their opinions. But the court insisted that since the leaflets they distributed were against national security, the First Amendment doesn't apply to them.
Thus, the correct answer is the second option.
The way the setting affected what Lucia thinks of the man who visited Papa is that B. The secretive location causes her to suspect that he is the reason for Papá’s mood.
<h3>How did the setting influence Lucia?</h3>
When papa came back into the house, he had a somber mood which frightened Lucia and made her think that Papa was in some kind of trouble. She suspected that the short man who was wearing a hat might be behind the mood of papa.
This thought of hers came about as a result of the setting where papa met the short man wearing the hat. The fact that it was a secretive location of the shadows in the front porch is why Lucia suspected that the man was suspicious enough to be behind papa's mood.
Find out more on The Red Umbrella at brainly.com/question/13705113
#SPJ1
Answer:
I don't know
Explanation:
sorry I didn't know that I have to orient them that if worse comes
Answer:
The rivalry between the French, Dutch, and the English for control of the fur trade in North America encouraged intertribal warfare among the Indians. The introduction of firearms proved detrimental to both Europeans as well as the Iroquois.
Explanation:
hope this helps:)
Answer:
What would happen to world if a disease outbreak happened and hit Gahana and affected Cocoa it would hurt the economy and companies because there is companies who mainly rely on cocoa to make profit and families rely on those companies to get paid. So it would hurt the american families and many families across the world.
Explanation:
