1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Pie
3 years ago
13

how was a colony different from a protectorate? -A colony was protected by an imperial power, but a protectorate was not. - A pr

otectorate helped defend an imperial power, but a colony did not. -A colony was independent of an imperial power but a proctectorate was not -A colony was controlled by an imperial power but a protectorate was not.
History
2 answers:
lidiya [134]3 years ago
7 0
The way that   a colony different from a protectorate is: <span>A colony was controlled by an imperial power, but a protectorate was not.
</span><span>A protectorate is an independent territory that protected by the greater nation. This type of nation has its own autonomy even though they technically act as a smaller alliance for the greater nation.</span>
VashaNatasha [74]3 years ago
3 0

A colony was controlled by an imperial power, but a protectorate was not.


You might be interested in
What TWO factors brought abolition to the forefront of political debates during the early nineteenth century?
Artemon [7]

The two correct answers are; The invention of the cotton gin and westward expansion.

Further Explanation:

The cotton gin helped to take the seeds out of the cotton, but it increased the need for plantation owners to have more slaves. Since the work was done faster with the gin, they needed more slaves to keep up the work. This caused political debates to abolish slavery, but it still took a long time to get slavery abolished.

The Westward expansion also increased the need for slaves. With so many people leaving the East coast, they needed slaves to help families cook, wash, and do many other things. This also got the political debates started and in the right direction, but it would still not end slavery altogether.

Learn more about abolition at brainly.com/question/2835737

#LearnwithBrainly

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following scenarios would historians identify as having
Vinil7 [7]

Answer: (B) The Roman Empire's legal system is a major influence on modern European Court Systems.

I just did this question and I got it right

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following types of cases would have to begin in a state-level court? disputes over interpretation of the Constituti
NISA [10]
Disputes arising from accident damage to property would begin in a state-level court. All others require a different type of court, such as federal, immigration, or supreme.
6 0
3 years ago
PLS HELP!!!!<br><br>WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST AND 50 POINTS
Ede4ka [16]

The answers are as follows:

1. In the painting, the white settlers are choosing to move West, they want to hope for  a better life up there and everyone in the village is moving as fast as they can.

2. The cases were Georgia was forcing the Cherokees off their land and were denying them rights. And Worcester v. Georgia was Georgia would not let non Native Americans on Native Americans land. Both of these cases relate to what is happening right now because president Trump will not let immigrants into the United States.

3. This movement is affecting our people by showing that thousands of them are dying because they barely get fed, or even have food, also they are dehydrated because the lack of water in their system, medical supplies incase they get sick from bacteria and bacteria that is not good for them they cannot solve. They want to move west where they have freedom, and will not be crowded.

4. Robert Lindeux’s purpose in this painting is to show you an idea of what life was like back then, and what is going on in this picture. He tries to help you understand the scene through his art, using body language and facial expressions.

Good luck!

-RxL

3 0
3 years ago
Iran established what form of government in the late 1970s
Sophie [7]
One of the most dramatic changes in government in Iran's history was seen with the 1979 Iranian Revolution<span> where </span>Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi<span>was overthrown and replaced by </span>Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini<span>. Autocratic monarchy was replaced by an </span>Islamic Republic<span> based on the principle of rule by Islamic jurists, (or "</span>Velayat-e faqih<span>"), where clerics serve as </span>head of state<span> and in many powerful governmental roles. A pro-</span>Western, pro-American<span> foreign policy was exchanged for one of "neither east nor west", said to rest on the three "pillars" of mandatory veil (</span>hijab<span>) for women, and opposition to the </span>United States<span> and </span>Israel.[1]<span> A rapidly modernizing, capitalist economy</span>[2][3]<span> was replaced by </span>populist<span> and </span>Islamic<span> economic and culture.</span>
7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What gains if any did women make in median income compared to men
    6·1 answer
  • What was Thomas Jefferson's opinion of the French Revolution?
    14·2 answers
  • What were the subjects of greek paintings
    12·1 answer
  • How did the crusades help lead to the creation of modern europe's nation states?
    6·2 answers
  • Please helppp it’s important
    11·1 answer
  • Witch term describes erosion​
    15·1 answer
  • When he British Navy engaged in impressment, what were they doing?
    14·1 answer
  • Economists can use new technology to
    12·1 answer
  • Which is a responsibility of the Senate in regards to foreign policy?
    7·1 answer
  • How did economic problems silence the roar of the Roaring Twenties? ​
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!