<span>"Consuls" would be the answer hope this helped
</span>
Answer:
Yes they usually are because people tend to look for easy questions to answer and help people out. Don't get me wrong there are some days where it's a little slow but the most I've had to wait is 20 minutes.
Explanation:
Answer:
1- Dominant --- most common or influential
2- Morals --- ideas about what is right and good
3- Rule of law --- the idea that everyone should be treated equally by the law
4- Intrinsic --- part of the basic nature of something
5- Ethics --- a set of rules that govern behavior
Explanation:
1- Dominant is understood as that political, social or cultural position that is majority or predominant in a certain place or sector. For example, the dominant political stance in the university sociological sector in the United States is the Democratic Party.
2- Moral is the set of internal rules that each person has regarding their behavior and their relationship with the rest of society, which are imposed by the individual on the basis of his social, historical and religious context.
3- The rule of law is the system of law that establishes freedom, equality, and equity among all citizens who are members of a community or nation. Through this, equality is guaranteed before the law and illegitimate inequalities such as slavery are prohibited.
4- An intrinsic question is that which is inherent in the very existence of the individual or thing to which it refers. For example, for liberal thinkers, freedom is intrinsic to the human condition.
5- Ethics is the set of social and legal norms that govern the conduct of society, through norms that may be imperative and enforceable for individuals.
Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1 (1964), was a U.S. Supreme Court case involving U.S. Congressional districts in the state of Georgia. The Court issued its ruling on February 17, 1964. This decision requires each state to draw its U.S. Congressional districts so that they are approximately equal in population.
Nationally, this decision effectively reduced the representation of rural districts in the U.S. Congress. Particularly, the Court held that the population differences among Georgia's congressional districts were so great as to violate the Constitution.
In reaching this landmark decision, the Supreme Court asserted that Article I, Section 2 of the United States Constitutionrequires that representatives shall be chosen "by the People of the several States" and shall be "apportioned among the several States...according to their respective Numbers...." These words, the Court held, mean that "as nearly as practicable one man's vote in a congressional election is to be worth as much as another's."
Wesberry and the Court's later "one person, one vote" decisions had an extraordinary impact on the makeup of the House, on the content of public policy, and on electoral politics in general. However, these "one person, one vote" rules do not prevent and have not prevented gerrymandering.
A related case, Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964), held that seats in both houses of a bicameral state legislaturemust also, to satisfy the Equal Protection Clause, represent districts as equal in population as practicably possible. The federal Senate was unaffected since the Constitution explicitly grants each state two senators.
<span><span><span>
</span></span></span>
The Indian Removal Act was signed into law by President Andrew Jackson on May 28, 1830, authorizing the president to grant unsettled lands west of the Mississippi in exchange for Indian lands within existing state borders. A few tribes went peacefully, but many resisted the relocation policy.
