Answer: Five countries each have the power to veto an action.
Explanation:
#1- The chart shows an increase over each decade. This means it is option B. We can come to this conclusion by looking at the rise of the dates and population number.
#2- The chart shows a dramatic increase. By eliminating all of the other options due to the fact everything increased and not the opposite, the answer must be B. We can also look at the left side of the chart to see the number of people living in New York increasing by more than two million.
#3- The picture clearly shows the idea that urbanization led to more Americans who preferred city living in the 1800s. We know from the charts that more people moved to New York during the 1800s, we can also see a lot of buildings in the picture. This leads me to conclude the answer must be B.
#4- Looking at the picture I believe the answer is A. I do not see the difference between residential or business areas, the water level, or the amount of trade being conducting. This leads me to conclude that A is the only correct option.
#5- I do not know this answer due to the lack of readable context and the fact that I do not take your course. I would need a date.
I hope my time and effort suffices your quench for knowledge. Have an amazing day and never stop learning! :)
Answer:
An example of the expansion of citizenship is Option B: The Nineteenth Amendment barred voting discrimination based on sex.
Explanation:
There is a lot of ambiguity surrounding citizenship and women but essentially before the right to vote, the citizenship rights a woman enjoyed were tied largely to her husband. She therefore had what is called derivative citizenship. A husband and wife became the same legal person under most laws and it was the husband's responsibility to act on behalf of his wife. She was not allowed to vote or hold property in her own name unless she had the permission of her husband in most cases. An American woman who married a foreign citizen would also lose her American citizenship. The assumption was that the woman would assume the citizenship of her husband, but the laws of many foreign countries did not make this automatically so. Women would become stateless in many cases by marrying a foreign spouse. This was especially the case in the marriages of American women and Asian men who were subject to legislation like the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 that denied them citizenship.
Answer:
The worry that more slaves states or free states would upset the balance of power and lead to a civil war
Explanation:
Answer:
The North American fur trade, an aspect of the international fur trade, was the acquisition, trade, exchange, and sale of animal furs in North America. Aboriginal peoples and Native Americans of various regions of the present-day countries of Canada and the United States traded among themselves in the pre–Columbian Era. Europeans participated in the trade from the time of their arrival to Turtle Island, commonly referenced as the New World, extending the trade's reach to Europe. The French started trading in the 16th century, the English established trading posts on Hudson Bay in present-day Canada during the 17th century, while the Dutch had trade by the same time in New Netherland. The North American fur trade reached its peak of economic importance in the 19th century, and involved the development of elaborate trade-networks.
The fur trade became one of the main economic ventures in North America, attracting competition among the French, British, Dutch, Spanish, Swedes and Russians. Indeed, in the early history of the United States, capitalizing on this trade, and removing the British stranglehold over it, was seen[by whom?] as a major economic objective. Many Native American societies across the continent came to depend on the fur trade[when?] as their primary source of income. By the mid-1800s changing fashions in Europe brought about a collapse in fur prices. The American Fur Company and some other companies failed. Many Native communities were plunged into long-term poverty and consequently lost much of the political influence they once had.
Explanation:
