Change in the medium allows the audience to use knowledge they already have to interpret the new form of the artwork.
<u>The following statements are true of works cited entries:</u>
-use hanging indents
<em>This means that all the lines of the entry are indented except the first line. </em>
-listed alphabetically
<em>This should be done according to the first item that appears in the works cited; it is usually the author's last name or the first word of an article's title. </em>
-include medium of publication
<em>Medium of publication refers to where one finds the source (example: web, book, magazine, etc) </em>
-include web addresses of Internet sources
<em>This means the URL (without the https://) DOI or permalink.</em>
-double spaced
<em>Usually all the essay is also double spaced. </em>
- For more information about works cited entries or how to cite visit: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/
Answer:
please provide the options
The answer is A. Kotowski cites four scholars who specialize in the study of volcanoes, whereas Ferguson cites only the encyclopedia.
The given thesis is arguing that Kotowski is more reliable than Ferguson because he backs up his statements with a greater number of more reliable sources. In choice A, Kotowski is not only using three more sources than Ferguson, but they're sources from reputable specialists, making them higher quality sources as well.
If you're still confused, you can use elimination to rule out the others:
B. B doesn't work because there's no mention of the rate of volcanic change in the thesis. Although the statement may be true, it's not evidence to support the writer's claim.
C. C doesn't work because there's no mention of the frequency of volcanic eruption in the thesis. Again, although the statement may be true, it doesn't necessarily support the writer's claim.
D. D doesn't work because there's no mention of the similarities between the two pieces. If the thesis is arguing that Kotowski's work is different from Ferguson's because it's more reliable, it'd be counterproductive for the writer to mention the similarities of the work. Therefore, this "evidence" has no relation to the thesis and would not support the author's thesis.
Hope this helps!
Appalachian, because Roy has a perfect
Temperature threat allows many veggies to grow in:)
