Answer:
According to Edward Rielly, the attack by the Mexican general José María Carrasco on the Apache camp, where his family resided, altered Geronimo's life forever. After this life-changing event, Geronimo became a bitter warrior. In his essay, Rielly uses facts and anecdotes about Geronimo as evidence to support his claim. He cites Geronimo's autobiography as the primary reference. He uses facts about how Geronimo behaved after the Mexican attack. For example, he describes how Geronimo burned his belongings, his children’s toys, and two tipis after returning from the attack.
While the essay flows smoothly, it lacks a traditional structure. For example, Rielly buries the thesis statement deep in the essay instead of including it in the first paragraph. Rielly also discusses some ideas and points that are not directly related to the primary claim. In the body of the essay, the writer uses a cause-and-effect strategy to present his reasons and supporting evidence.
Rielly also appeals to the readers’ emotions (pathos) by describing the attack on the Apache camp. First, he describes the murder of Geronimo’s wife, mother, and three children. Then, Rielly paints a poignant picture when he describes Geronimo standing alone in a river after he finds his entire family massacred.
Edward Rielly’s article about Geronimo doesn’t seem to have any obvious logical fallacies, and it is well-written. This is a good essay because it provides solid supporting evidence, and it demonstrates clear cause-and-effect relationships to support the claim about the life-changing event in Geronimo's life.
Explanation:
