Today is going to be a great day. I'm so excited, my first birthday getting to travel. I know I will miss Ireland, but I am definitely excited about going to the United States.
I'm having a real hard time deciding what I want to buy, I have a $10 coin to spend but I just can't make my mind up. Do I want candy, maybe a kite, this just hasn't been an easy decision.
I think when we make it to the United States I will find something new and interesting there. I think it will be good to get involved in new things, it might help me to forget about being so said about Ireland.
My mom tells me it will be much different where we are going, her excitement is what ignites mine, I don't think I could do this without her. Great things are sure to come, and it's all on my birthday, what a day.
---I Tried:( I don't think I got the wording right considering it was meant to be 1892.
Answer:
Indeed, when the Supreme Court interprets the scope of a certain law, it often creates rights, obligations or legal clauses that are not specifically written in said laws. This type of source of law is called jurisprudence, and it creates rights in the same way as laws, being a totally legitimate means.
This judicial activism is part of the work of the Supreme Court and judges in general; if judges only applied laws without interpreting them or delimiting their scope in specific situations, many specific situations of citizens or groups would be overlooked, which would lead to injustices and situations in which the law would not fulfill its purpose, which is to guarantee a peaceful and harmonious life in society.
Explanation:
Judicial activism refers to a judge or court who is more willing to declare legal or governmental actions invalid. This concept is broader than the strict right to review, in which a judge checks to what extent a law, decision or measure complies with the Constitution.
In America, judicial activism relies on the groundbreaking Supreme Court ruling in Marbury v. Madison, when the Court appropriated the right to review laws and government decisions in general from going against the Constitution.
Republicans use the term in the United States to oppose political interference by the Supreme Court by broadly interpreting constitutional law. According to the Democrats, however, legal activism is necessary to protect minorities from an irrational and discriminatory majority morality.
ziggurat, i hope this helps!
<span>Benedict of Nursia wrote the rules for monks living in monasteries</span>