Live up to her lovely face is a metaphor
someone tell me if im wrong
Answer:
Jem says Tom's punishment is inappropriate, but he can't describe why. Maybe assault shouldn't be a capital offense. Atticus says he has no problem with the assault statute, but he has "serious reservations" when the state asks for the death penalty on circumstantial evidence. Before a person is executed, eyewitnesses should testify that they observed the crime. In the absence of that, there is always "the shadow of a doubt... the possibility, no matter how improbable, that he's innocent." Jem notes that the jury convicted a man on circumstantial evidence. He believes juries should be eliminated. Atticus offers a superior solution to Regulate. Only judges should decide death sentences.
Explanation:
This is my opinion to your question...Change words to your own and avoid plagiarism. :)
Answer:
1. Sura and Baya
2. 3 characters
3. Baya sees a goat.
4. Sura broke the agreement.
5. It's wrong to break a promise once you have agreed to it but it's also wrong to do things with your selfish motives. You have be open-minded.
Explanation:
The title of the story is written above.
There are 3 characters in the story, which are Sura, Baya and the goat.
In the beginning of the story Baya sees a goat.
Sura broke the promise by going on land where Baya lived.
Lastly, the lesson we can learn in this story is that it was wrong for Sura to break the promise they had but it was also wrong of Baya to be selfish. Baya should've been more open minded and at least let Sura have some food as Sura was very hungry.
Answer:
Each new step in science reconciles twenty seemingly discordant facts as merely the various manifestations of a single principle.
Explanation:
Even though the only context we have is the sentence itself, we can safely choose number 2. This type of sentence is used when we wish to present contrasting ideas. There would be no reason, for example, for science to unify what is already harmonious, or to undermine what is already erroneous. Those ideas are redundant. It makes much more sense to say that science reconciles facts that are seemingly discordant. That is the wonder in science: to see different things as the manifestations of a single principle, which could seem, if science did not exist, impossible.
I could an say that they are very helpful because without resources there wouldn’t be a google or dictionary those are resources that we need.
