Answer:
Explanation:
Human relationship to nature depends on how hospitable nature is to our everyday lives. As long as nature does not affect our everyday lives in a significant matter, humans will continue to ignore its effects and do what they want. The moment nature begins to drastically change the way we live, and begin making our everyday lives difficult or dangerous then that is when the human relationship to nature will begin changing. By then humans will have a deeper respect for nature and try to develop solutions to be able to protect our planet so that we can go back to the hospitable and easy livestyles that we had before.
Answer:
Oceania became a supply source in 1788 for the settlement of Australia. Pigs from Tahiti were landed at Sydney in 1793, and until 1826 the trade remained important, although it was subject to price fluctuations.
To trade with island people.
Answer:
Scandanavia
Explanation:
I believe the answer is Scandanavia
All of the above are relevant factors to be evaluated for moral intensity except
<u>Explanation:</u>
Moral intensity is the intensity of feeling that a person has about the values of a moral choice.
- The magnitude of the consequences: This is the quantity of the evils forced on the victims of the decision.
- Social consensus: This is the point of social recognition that an act is either moral or sinful.
- Proximity: This is the sense of intimacy, either culturally, psychologically, or bodily, that the soul has for the victims of the act in question.
- The concentration of effect: This is an inverse function of the number of characters hit by an act of any given measure.
This seems to be an opinion based question, I will provide you with both a yes and no response with arguments to support it and you can choose which one best suites your beliefs:
Yes, the benefits of raising the minimum wage outweigh the drawbacks. By raising the minimum wage you increase the quality of life for workers. Many full time workers are unable to afford housing or groceries in this economy on the minimum wage. At $7.25/hour and 40hrs/week is $290 before taxes. This is not enough income to cover the basic costs of living in most places. If people earned more money they would have more money to spend and corporations would profit from an increase in sales. Also, workers wouldn't have to depend so much on government services such as food stamps and section 8 housing assistance because they would be able to support their families with their own income. This would free up funds for government to provide more for the school systems, better healthcare and/or infrastructure.
No, the benefits of an increased minimum wage would not outweigh the drawbacks. The drawbacks of a higher minimum wage are significant because they most directly effect small business owners. The "mom and pop shop" owners depend on paying low salaries in order to keep their doors open. If they were forced to increase their pay rates, by what many minimum wage supporters suggest: more than double, they would not be able to afford employees to keep their doors open. Also, government agencies would be forced to pay their low-level workers as much as $15/hr which could become a tax burden on the citizens who pay for the salaries of all government employees. Raising the minimum wage would be detrimental to the economy because small companies and the government could not afford to support the salaries and benefits of their workers.
