1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lunna [17]
3 years ago
7

What happened in Russia as a result of actions by Peter the Great

History
1 answer:
kykrilka [37]3 years ago
6 0

Peter the Great completely transformed Russia from formerly being an isolated small kingdom into becoming a superpower with lots of influence. Once he became Czar of Russia he made sure that they had access to sea routes by traveling to Western Europe and making deals. He planned the build of the city St. Petersburg which in 1711 became the capital. He used Enlightenment ideas to change Russia's new laws to be more modern and fit better. He was also in charge of numerous wars and proved himself to be an amazing face of Russia who changed it for the better.

You might be interested in
Thomas Paine wrote many pamphlets. Look on the internet or at the library to find out the name of another pamphlet written by Jo
ra1l [238]

Answer:

Thomas Paine was a Political Philosopher in the United States. In his writings, he stated the need for a Declaration of independence from Great Britain. The Pamphlets written by Thomas Paine include Common sense, Right of man and American crisis.

Common sense- It is an article that particularly talked about the Independence of America from Great Britain. It is divided into four parts. These parts explain the government of Britain and the Constitution. It talks about the Monarchical system, the current state of the United States and America's capability.

Generally, it criticizes the Monarchical system of governance by Britain and the major fact that the Monarchs are only in government to "declare wars" and apportion lands, nothing else. He further advises that America is permitted to revolt against the British Monarchy.

Right of a man- According to Thomas Paine, there are some rights accrued to a person in a society and that these rights should in no way be curtailed. In this essay, he states that revolution against the political structure of a state is allowed where the government does not protect the natural rights of the people.

American crisis-  American crisis- this pamphlet also referred to the Revolutionary War between America and Great Britain. He also referred to the bible as he states that God will be of great help in the revolution.

8 0
3 years ago
9. Oberlin College was unusual because it admitted women and African Americans.
Savatey [412]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Write two paragraphs describing the different points of view in the following scenarios:
solmaris [256]

Answer:No secession ball will mark the day. Nor, it appears, are any other commemorative events planned by Texas, which would rather boast of its time as an independent country. But 150 years ago today, shortly after 11 a.m. on Feb. 1, 1861, a state convention voted overwhelmingly to secede from the Union.

In Austin, on the second floor of the old Texas statehouse just south of the current Capitol building (near the present-day Alamo and Texas Rangers monuments), cheering delegates to the special convention approved a short document declaring that the federal government was becoming "a weapon with which to strike down the interests and prosperity of the people of Texas and her Sister slaveholding States." Texas, they stated, was henceforth a "separate Sovereign state ... absolved from all allegiance to the United States." (An even more explicit "declaration of causes" followed a day later; it's well worth a read.)

For one aging veteran in the hall, this was the blackest of days. Sam Houston, the 67-year-old governor of Texas (who had twice served as president of the Republic of Texas), had for years almost single-handedly kept secessionist sentiment in the state at bay, despite being a slaveholder himself. Nearly three decades earlier, Houston had fought for Texan independence from Mexico and guided the fledgling Republic into the Union. He did not want to lose his life's work. "Mark me, the day that produces a dissolution of this [Union] will be written in the blood of humanity," Houston, then a U.S. senator, told Congress in 1854 as he defied Southern predilections to vote against the Kansas-Nebraska Act.

Of himself, he had said: "I wish no prouder epitaph to mark the board or slab that may lie on my tomb than this: 'He loved his country, he was a patriot; he was devoted to the Union.'"

As secessionist fever swept Texas, Houston was denounced as a "traitor-knave" for his Unionist views. Always, though, when the grand old man — who still hobbled from a wound sustained at San Jacinto in 1836 — took the stage, he had been able to quell his rivals. But as the year 1860 drew to a close, with Abraham Lincoln's election causing South Carolina to secede and other states to teeter on the brink, Houston, despite being governor, could no longer hold back the tide.

He tried. When secessionists began clamoring for a special legislative session in anticipation of secession, Houston stalled. Soon, however, a secession convention at the end of January 1861 appeared inevitable. Houston convened a special session of the Legislature just before the convention, hoping that he could somehow persuade lawmakers to rein in the proceedings.

It was not to be. The delegates — chosen in a hastily organized election in early January — convened in Austin on Jan. 28, 1861, and quickly penned a document that would sever Texas' ties to the federal government. Houston was invited to the roll call on Feb. 1. He sat "grim and motionless," writes his biographer M.K. Wisehart. One man called him a traitor to his face, though Houston's allies swiftly demanded (and received) an apology. The delegates approved the secession ordinance, 166-8.

The governor won a few concessions, however. He had said he would swallow secession if the people ratified it — so it was put to a vote on Feb. 23, 1861, and the people affirmed it, 44,317 to 13,020. Houston tried to argue that Texas voters had merely approved secession, rather than latching onto the Confederacy. This was technically true, but the governor, who preferred that Texas should return to its old status as an independent country, had lost his sway. In March, Texas became the last state to join the Confederacy in the "first wave," before hostilities broke out at Fort Sumter.

A defiant Houston would swear no oath to the Confederacy, and he was finished as governor. "Fellow citizens, in the name of your rights and liberties, which I believe have been trampled upon, I refuse to take this oath," he declared on March 16, 1861. "In the name of the nationality of Texas, I refuse to take this oath. …" Nor would he live to see the end of the war he tried so hard to avert; he died in 1863, a year after the Battle of Shiloh, in which his son, Sam Jr., a Confederate soldier, was wounded and held prisoner for months. Texas, in fact, would become the site of the last battle of the Civil War, in May 1865. It was also the last rebel state readmitted to the Union, on March 30, 1870, subject to several conditions.

There is another peculiar post-script to the secessionist drama of 1861.

Oddly enough, one Robert E. Lee was living in Texas at that time. Lee had been stationed in Texas on and off for several years, commanding the Second United States Cavalry in frontier skirmishes against Comanches and Mexicans. He didn't seem too fond of the frontier life; he wrote to his wife of living of a "desert of dullness."

8 0
3 years ago
What is the main ideas of imperialism?<br><br> Need help???????!!!!!!!!
Ainat [17]

1. Economic competition among industrial nations.

2. Political and military competition, including the creation of a strong naval force.

3. A belief in the racial and cultural superiority of people of Anglo-Saxon descent.

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was not a cause of world war i?
Karolina [17]
The answer is European nationalism
6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • In a 1903 meeting of the Social Democratic Party, an ideological split developed between the Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks who f
    6·2 answers
  • Whom did the United States displace or deport during the Great Depression and World War II.
    6·1 answer
  • Why did the belgian colonial government in rwanda establish a national identity card that included the category "ethnicity"?
    14·1 answer
  • A colony with a warm climate and fertile soil likely had an economy based on:
    6·1 answer
  • Explain why the process of industrialization is called a revolution, and summarize the effects of industrialization on the peopl
    12·2 answers
  • Why is Mr. Auld angry when he finds that Mrs.
    11·1 answer
  • Analyze the economic, social, and political factors that influenced colonial southern planters to shift from relying on indentur
    9·1 answer
  • Some of the different kinds of entertainment that became available to the common family included _____. Select all that apply.
    10·2 answers
  • Sweeping changes in farming led by inventions like the plow and seed drill ​
    5·1 answer
  • Helo how to ak qeston?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!