Answer:
What arguments could be made for removing the dictator?
Arguments for removing the dictator are: allowing the country to establish a democracy. Helping out or improving the situation of those demographic groups that were oppressed by the dictator. Another argument is simply punishing the dictator for his crimes.
What arguments could be made for keeping the dictator in power?
The main argument for keeping the dictator is to ensure the stability of the country, even if such stability is unfair at many times, and comes along with the oppresion of certain social and political groups.
Another argument is simply to prevent the country from getting worse.
A final argument is pragmatic: keeping the dictator in power might serve everyone's interests better. Democratic countries have frequently established ties with authoritarian governments.
Answer: There was organized resistance from the Shawnee in the village namespace “Prophetstown”, so in effect, William Henry Harrison sent the troops to destroy the village.
They lost their main source of food which led to starvation and war among the once harmonious tribes.
Answer: Here's a reason.
Explanation:
The release of two atomic bombs on Japan in August 1945 helped end World War II but ushered in the Cold War, a conflict between the United States and the Soviet Union that dragged on nearly half a century. In the United States, the use of the bombs was widely praised by a public tired of war and high casualties.
Hope I helped.
Answer:
Britain had the people, powers and motivation it took in order revolutionize.
