Answer:
A
Explanation:
To calculate the adult population, we simply make use of the data available from the BLS.
We can simply make the calculations by adding the number of employed Adult Americans to the number of unemployed adult Americans.
We simply do not have any business with the number not in labor force because they are actually part of those that are employed but are not just in the labor force.
The adult population is thus:
143,929,000 + 11,460,000 =155,389,000
Exact interest method is using 365 days instead of 360.
We are going to use the formula: I = Prt, we will derived
the formula of rate.
r = I /Pt would be our formula, plugging in our amounts.
r = 93.37 / 2000 / (284/365)
= 93.37 / 2000 (0.7781)
= 93.37 / 1556.1643
= 0.06 or 6% when converted to percent.
To check:
I = Prt
= 2000 x 0.06 x 284/365
= 120 x 0.7781
= 93.37
Answer:
b. Roma and Taylor
Explanation:
In this case each attorney is liable for his negligence, so Taylor will be liable for not appearing in court .
Roma is his supervisor, and he will also be liable because he is responsible for Taylor's performance.
The other attorneys in the firm will not be liable, because there is personal liability. When they are not directly involved in negligence, they will not be liable to Umberto.
Speak to their corporate consumer department.
Answer:
The answer is: Alais will prevail because of material breach of the contract
Explanation:
Material breach in contract law refers to one party failing to perform under the contract significantly enough so that the aggrieved party has the right to sue for breach of contract.
In this case when Rutherford failed to perform, Alais sustained enough "damage" that enables her to sue Rutherford. She probably was no longer able to finish her job in time.