You have such nice writing, i like cursive writing :-)
Answer: There is a reversible error because of the possible prejudice to the governor in the dismissal of the juror.
Explanation: A juror is a member of a jury. A jury are group of people chosen from the general population whose duty is to hear and decide on a case in a court of law.
If an elderly woman claims that she is being pressured to by other jurors to find the Governor guilty, then this a case of prejudice i.e the jurors are making an adverse judgement.
Therefore, the Governor has a case in any event he appeals since the judgment appears to be based on prejudice.
<u>Answer:
</u>
Yes, it is true that researchers looking for cause-and-effect relationships will most often use epidemiological studies.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The functioning pattern of the epidemiological study characterizes its method and manner of probing and investigating to the depth of the issue in order to find the root cause of the problem that has been encountered.
- Thus, to probe for a cause and effect relationship, an epidemiological study would prove to be highly beneficial as it would put to use the right methods of investigation.
The answer is false. The Dawes Act fizzled in light of the fact that the plots were too little for manageable horticulture. The Native American Indians needed devices, cash, involvement or mastery in cultivating. The cultivating way of life was a total outsider lifestyle. The Dawes Severalty Act was marked by Grover Cleveland in 1887 with the expectation of absorbing Native Americans into the United States. To do this, tribal control of reservations was taken away and the land was conceded to people possessions.
