I think its A. I know it deals with freedom
<span>The correct answer is B. It was a major step forward for civilization because it protected the weak from the strong. There were laws before it but they weren't as comprehensive. Hammurabi stated himself in the introduction that it is made to protect weak from the strong. The law was based on an eye for an eye basis, meaning if for example cut someone's hand off, you would have your hand cut off.</span>
The main reason why external criticism is so important when it comes to analyzing data is because as the handler of the data yourself, you can quickly develop a bias and "expect" a certain outcome, which might affect your analysis.
Under the leadership of British statesman Edward G. Wakefield, the first British colonists to New Zealand arrived at Port Nicholson. While attempting to land, so many crews were killed by warriors from Maori people, who interpreted the European's exchange trumpet signals as a prelude to battle. The effect of this colonization can be summarized by the statement:
The Maori won legal equality early on but saw their rights taken away over time.
Answer:
No, I do not believe that it caused the Civil War. The Civil war was more caused by the states for slavery and against slavery spliting up and fighting to the point where it ended up causing a Civil War.
Explanation:
