What are the answer choices
Three ways WW1 went from being a localized European conflict to a global one:
The declaration of war by Britain in 1914 brought the Commonwealth into the war involving far-away countries like Canada and Australia and India.
One method used by the Germans to defeat Britain was sea blockade; by the German High Seas Fleet at the beginning of the war then with submarines later... this was counters by the British Home Fleet based at Scapa Flow. By trying to cut off goods being sent to Britain the war was fought at sea also in the Channel and in the Atlantic.
Neutral countries like the USA joining later in the war in 1917 make WW1 an even bigger global conflict.
A forth way is how the British, French and Germans all had colonies in Africa - and fought each other there also.
Hope that helps :)
The presidential elections of 1932. hope this helps. :)
Answer:
This type of Media Bias is called Bias by Omission.
Explanation:
Bias by omission – leaving one side out of an article, or a series of articles over a period of time; ignoring facts that tend to disprove liberal or conservative claims, or that support liberal or conservative beliefs; bias by omission can occur either within a story, or over the long term as a particular news outlet reports one set of events, but not another. To find instances of bias by omission, be aware of the conservative and liberal perspectives on current issues. See if both the conservative and liberal perspectives are included in stories on a particular event or policy.
The main difference between these two parties was just who would have more power, the national or the state governments.
The Federalists as the name itself implies were those who supported the stronger federal government as they believed that if the states had more power the country would be weaker and would not be able to address the issue that would impact the whole nation quickly and efficiently.
The Democratic-Republicans on the other hand, again as their name implies, were more in favor of stronger state governments as they believed and feared that a strong federal government could lead to the loss of freedom they so desperately fought for.
