I believe this is primary source
If the source is like a artifact, a diary, journals, speeches, memoirs, autobiographies or anything that was created by the witness of the event like for instance, a personal narrative
(Sorry this is the best I can explain a primary source, an example would be the diary of anne frank)
If the source is a interpretation version or a work that analyzes a event it would be considered secondary source
(An example would be “A book about the holocaust” because the author wasn’t there to witness the event, the author is just writing a biography on it)
I think an easy way to remember this would be
Autobiographies (writing about your own life) - primary source
Biography (Ex. A book about blah blah blah) - secondary source
I’m not sure if you get what I’m trying to say here but I hope it helps
The words hideous, revolting, and false show the speaker's disgust over slavery.
Answer: Option C.
Explanation:
The tone and the meaning of any passage is determined by the way the author makes use of words. The words: hideous, revolting, and false are all the terms which conveys a negative meaning and thus usage of such words will definitely result in negative tone. By making use of such words, the speaker is trying to show his strong disapproval over slavery. The speaker is trying to put forward how America is blind towards slavery.
Answer:
Identify the mistake?
Explanation:
1. run-on
2. comma splice. It should be a period not a comma.
3. novel, then. There should be a period not comma
4. correct sentence
5. This one is kind of tricky, but I would suggest "correct sentence."
A and B would be the right answers to this question. Hope I was able to help.