Answer: As long as they hold good behavior.
Explanation: As long as they play by the rules and do their job correctly and legally, they stay in their position
Answer:
Yes i think this is right. Many successful criminal prosecutions in the United States end not with jury trials. Instead this gives a defendant a chance for a shorter sentence, especially if the defendant is not guilty. Agreeing to plead guilty to some or all of the charges against them in exchange for concessions from the prosecutors. These agreements allow prosecutors to focus their time and resources on other cases, and reduce the number of trials that judges need to oversee.
Explanation:
<em>None Needed</em>
Answer:
The following clause states that "Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each state to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other state"
a. The Full Faith and Credit Clause
Explanation:
- The option a is correct as the full faith and credit clause of the United States Constitution states that each state should give full faith and credit to the public acts, records and judicial proceedings of any other state in the United State of America.
- The option b is incorrect as The Privileges and Immunities Clause provides safeguard against the discrimination for the people of a state in other state.
- The option c is incorrect as this clause is about commerce matters so it is irrelevant here.
- The option d is incorrect as this clause is related to the agreement between the parties so it is also irrelevant here.
- The option e is also incorrect as the this bill is about the rights of the public and many more so it is also irrelevant in the given situation.
The two other answers to this question are spot on, but I'm going to interpret this question in a different way. I'm going to answer it as if the question said "Who was the first presidential style Prime Minister of UK?"
I would argue that there have been two 'Presidents of the United Kingdom': Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair.
For the first eight years of her administration, Margaret Thatcher was effectively 'the President of the United Kingdom'. Her administration was able to do things most post war PMs were not able to do, possibly buoyed by the large mandates she was given by the British public in 1979 and 1983.
Given the landslide election of 1997, it became almost impossible for the Conservative party to win the 2001 election, and very unlikely that would would have much of a chance in 2005 (Michael Portillo's words, not just mine). With this sort of a political landscape and public mandate, Blair was able to govern as a de-facto president, allowing him to push through parliament decisions that didn't have, not only, the public's backing but even the backing of much of the Labour party. This can be seen in Blair's decisions regarding Iraq and Afghanistan post 9/11.
