How did the attitudes of Abraham Lincoln and Jefferson Davis compare as the Union and the Confederacy prepared for war?

2 answers:

7 0

Lincoln did not want war but would fight to keep the Union, while Davis was ready for war and ordered the first attack.

maksim [4K]3 years ago

5 0

Lincoln did not want war but would fight to keep the Union, while Davis was ready for war and ordered the first attack and this was the difference in attitudes of Abraham Lincoln and Jefferson Davis as the Union and the Confederacy prepared for war. The correct option among all the options given in the question is the last option or the fourth option.

You might be interested in

a. Sam Houston established peace councils to encourage talks between Native Americans and Anglos. b. The Comanche did not attend

Lilit [14]

Answer:d.

The peace talks fell apart and no treaty was signed.

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Where did the union pacific and central RR companies meet?

Dafna1 [17]

Answer:

Utah

Explanation:

On May 10, 1869, the presidents of the Union Pacific and Central Pacific railroads meet in Promontory, Utah, and drive a ceremonial last spike into a rail line that connects their railroads. This made transcontinental railroad travel possible for the first time in U.S. history.

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The first modern management articles were published in ________ journals.

jeka57 [31]

Answer:

Engineering journals

Explanation:

5 0

1 year ago

Why did ruling families in Japan sponsor court life?

Citrus2011 [14]

Answer:

In the Japanese constitutional monarchy, the emperor does not have any political power. In world politics, he is the only current emperor. The current emperor is his Majesty emperor Naruhito. ... The Emperor of Japan has sometimes been a cleric with mostly symbolic powers and sometimes an actual ruler.

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

After the communist victory in its civil war, china embraced an economy wherein private property and private ownership of capita

scoundrel [369]

All of the statements are examples of collective ownership in the socialist countries.
Collective ownership, at it's core, represents ownership of something, most commonly land and industrial assets, from all members of a group for the mutual benefit of all. This was implemented in most of the socialistic countries, but still the main and dominant owner was usually the government itself, while the people had shares in most of the industries and land.

4 0

3 years ago