Part A: The probability is 1/6. This is because there are six options in total, and only one of those options is 6.
Part B: The probability is 6/6, or alternatively 100%. This is because that the probability of rolling a 6 is 1/6, and the probability of rolling any of the other options is 5/6. Adding them together gives a probability of 6/6.
Part C: The probability is 5/6. This is because there are six options, and of those, five of them are not 6.
If you use a laptop: 9.25; a desktop with a CRT monitor: 55.51; a desktop with an LCD monitor: 46.26.
A laptop that is plugged up and turned off uses 0.001kw/hr of energy. Each kwh of energy produces, on average, 1.39 lbs of CO2. There are 24*7=168 hours in the week; subtract the 40 hour work week from this and we have 128 hours a week for 52 weeks a year:
0.001*128*52=6.656*1.39=9.25.
A desktop that is plugged up and turned off uses 0.004kw/hr of energy. A CRT monitor uses 0.002 kw/hr when turned off. This means we have:
(0.004*128*52*1.39)+(0.002*128*52*1.39)=55.51.
For a desktop and an LCD monitor, which uses 0.001 kw/hr of energy, we have:
(0.004*128*52*139)+(0.001*128*52*1.39)=46.26.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Full charge can be expressed as equation:</u>
- c = 2.5 + 0.75m, where c- charge, m- miles
<u>The limit for charge is $13, then we got inequality:</u>
- 0.75m + 2.5 ≤ 13
- 0.75m ≤ 9.5
- m ≤ 9.5/0.75
- m ≤ 12.66
Option B: 10 is correct as the only number satisfying the inequality
D, there is no division property of equality
Answer:
D. f(t) = 192,345(1.04)^t
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>I took the test and it was right. </em>
Also that is the original price and when you look at exponential functions, the starting point or original price is always first the then rate of increase. The table just shows how it increased in year 1 and 2.
Hope this helps. :)
