When engaging in "caring" the group leader shows a genuine concern for others through their openness and honesty.
According to my thought, leaders must show they think about individuals and care about them through receptiveness and genuineness. They have a certifiable worry for others to take into account positive results in gathering. Offering backing, consolation, and insurance. Hope this helps.
The people of <u>Lebanon</u> are overwhelmingly Arab but are divided by religion.
All of the above would be the correct answer
<span>According to allport in the nature of prejudice schemas </span><span>category is a category that resists change even when faced with contradictory evidence.
Schemas is a framework that created form in dept analysis for behavioral pattern. This pattern is strongly engraved within human's mind, to the point where it became really hard to change</span>
God, if I could choose, I would say none. All of these lead to inequality (because circumstances vary between many individuals) but I believe prestige should hold the most weight in determining social class. Prestige (which is respect, recognition, or regard) is based on many criteria, including wealth, family background, fame, leadership, power, occupation, and accomplishments. Leadership, power, and accomplishments can both be achieved by any individual with hard work. This is still an unfair balance (gender inequality, racial/ethnical inequality/racism) because of individual factors, it still leaves hope for some people to rise the social ladder.
