Since a modifier has to more information about something, by definition that means the something it is modifying or limiting has to exist. That means, of course, that you can't just say The happy. If you did, people would immediately ask you: "the happy what?" That missing what is the thing being modified.
It seems pretty obvious and intuitive when written in a simple sentence, and it seems hard to imagine a situation in which a modifier would be left dangling. However, modifiers don't always have to be simple words or phrases like happy, and sentences aren't always simple.
Phrases can also act as modifiers, providing additional information about something else in the sentence. When this occurs, and when sentences become more complex, dangling modifiers can sometimes exist and get lost in the complexity of the language.
You can use my explaination to find the sentence.
1. The author describes Buck's progress as retrogression because <span>B. Buck was returning to his ancient instinctual roots. He is partly domesticated, but nevertheless he feels the urge to return to his roots of a wild animal.
2. The literary element </span><span>that describes how Francois and Perrault speak in the novel is called C. dialect. It is the way that people talk in some areas of the world.
3.The option which is not an element of plot is A. point of view (because that is the perspective of the novel), whereas climax and exposition are.
4. Climax is the most intense part of a novel which leads to the resolution of a text. Here, the climax in chapter 3 is when B. Buck and Spits have a final confrontation. </span>
The answer is Its.
Theirs/their pertains to more than one person belonging to items.
It's is a contraction form of "it is".
Answer:
D I think I could be wrong
Explanation:
