Answer:
In writing, context refers to information that helps readers accurately interpret the meaning of a text. Context can take many forms, including background information or details about the circumstances, environment, or timeframe in which work takes place. The defining characteristic of context is that it helps to clarify the meaning of a work of writing.
Explanation:
Your answer is going to be B
Whereas Ralph and Jack stand at opposite ends of the spectrum between civilization and savagery, Simon stands on an entirely different plane from all the other boys. Simon embodies a kind of innate, spiritual human goodness that is deeply connected with nature and, in its own way, as primal as Jack’s evil. The other boys abandon moral behavior as soon as civilization is no longer there to impose it upon them. They are not innately moral; rather, the adult world—the threat of punishment for misdeeds—has conditioned them to act morally. To an extent, even the seemingly civilized Ralph and Piggy are products of social conditioning, as we see when they participate in the hunt-dance.
In Golding’s view, the human impulse toward civilization is not as deeply rooted as the human impulse toward savagery. Unlike all the other boys on the island, Simon acts morally not out of guilt or shame but because he believes in the inherent value of morality. He behaves kindly toward the younger children, and he is the first to realize the problem posed by the beast and the Lord of the Flies—that is, that the monster on the island is not a real, physical beast but rather a savagery that lurks within each human being. The sow’s head on the stake symbolizes this idea, as we see in Simon’s vision of the head speaking to him. Ultimately, this idea of the inherent evil within each human being stands as the moral conclusion and central problem of the novel. Against this idea of evil, Simon represents a contrary idea of essential human goodness. However, his brutal murder at the hands of the other boys indicates the scarcity of that good amid an overwhelming abundance of evil.
The narrator decides to murder the old man because he is crazy. I can tell this because he does not like the old man's eye. He calls it a vultures eye even though it is just a normal eye that has gone blind. Also, many times he tries to prove himself that he is not crazy. He even starts the first sentence of his story by asking the readers that why would we think that he has gone mad. It states in the first sentence, "TRUE!—NERVOUS—VERY, very dreadfully nervous I had been and am; but why will you say that I am mad?" Furthermore, he says for himself that he wanted nothing from his gold or anything like that, he just did not like his eye. In the text it states, "He had never wronged me. He had never given me insult. For his gold I had no desire. I think it was his eye! yes, it was this!" Later, he thinks he can hear the old man's heart, and since he thinks that others can hear it too. Therefore, he kills the old man to protect himself from being discovered. This can be seen in the passage, "But the beating grew louder, louder! I thought the heart must burst. And now a new anxiety seized me—the sound would be heard by a neighbour!" From the textual evidence we can certainly infer that the narrator has gone extremely mad.
<span>B.) There is a difference between the actions and the ideals of the United States.</span>
