Answer:
See below
Explanation:
The conflict is man vs. nature.
The resolution is when the man finally feels at piece and he is not in pain anymore because he is dead.
Answer:
hi! The answer to this would be D.)
Explanation:
I reread your paragraph, the thing your reading, and I think it makes the most sense! If i'm wrong then I'm sorry but I made sure and sure enough I still got D as the best answer!
Enjoy your day! Lemme know if I was helpful! ^^
Noriya~
(P.S I love your tamaki profile! so baby!)
There are a lot of answers to this question depending on
the given choices to choose from. So next time please be kind enough to include
the choices. I can give you three possible answers for this question, now it
all depends on you to choose which one of these three are in the choices:
Select 1:
1. Readers are forced to consider the possible monstrous
actions inside of themselves, like hatred or prejudice.
2. The monster challenges readers to recognize that a
monster could be an ordinary person, not just an outcast.
3. Readers must consider that monsters live among them, maybe
in their own town.
We can actually see that the commonality in the three
choices tells us that the monster does not really refer to the monsters
depicted in fiction. However, monsters could be just ordinary person, it could
even perhaps refer to us. What makes us a monster is our personality, not our
appearance.
<span> </span>
<span>C) "Of course it is wrong to let young people miss out on quality education." </span>
The water ran down from her hair and clothes; it ran down into the toes of her shoes and out again at the heels. And yet she said that she was a real princess. ... Now they knew that she was a real princess because she had felt the pea right through the twenty mattresses and the twenty eider-down beds.
