Answer:
Why not?
Explanation:
There's little reason not too. i mean he's just a dead guy, what else are they gonna do with him.
Answer:
The way Goring's speech differs from Churchill's one is that Gorings spoke to motivate the germans to fight for their identity as "nationalists" by attacking what was against nationalism, even if it was against humanity or some other idea. While Churchill's speech invited the people to fight with everything in the last chance humanity had to be saved.
Explanation:
How Goring's speech differs from Churchill's is because, in the first place, Goring speech was given from a very aggressive way talking about what was nationalism and what was not. And what the expected behavior of a nationalist should be, in other words, it qualified and disqualified the listeners to force them to do what a nationalist should have done, or they would face the consequences of not being a nationalist. It also claimed that they were not criminals or responsible for the atrocities of the first world war, but that they were victors and that years had passed so that image was no longer valid.
Instead, Winston Churchill invited the listeners to do their part in the only chance humanity had to be saved and not fall into the dominion of Hitler, that would destroy humanity as it was once known.
Answer:
It was winner-takes-all approach do not count the votes of the losing candidates in each state, It allows the election of a candidate who does not win the majority votes, and it was undemocratic.
Answer:
The power of the Federal Government is limited to the powers granted in the Constitution. The Government can not do what the people have not authorized in the Constitution. Could not raise an army, collect taxes, regulate trade interstate or foreign trade, force states to follow laws.
Explanation:
hope it helps
